DECEMBER 23, 2009This Week in Health Reform Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), may just reach his goal of getting a health care reform package approved by the Senate by Christmas. This past week, Sen. Reid clinched the 60th vote needed to pass the legislation. As of this communication, he has scheduled the final Senate vote for 7 a.m. on Christmas Eve day. In an effort to shore up votes, Sen. Reid and his colleagues struck deals to overcome hot-button issues such as abortion funding.Quoting & Saving just got easier…Easy To Insure ME Health Insurance Quotes… Quote all carriers in secondsHealth care reformHealth insurance Exchange Senate NegotiationsSenate Eyes Finish Line: After weeks of rancorous debate and more than 20 straight days and nights spent negotiating on Capitol Hill, Senate lawmakers cleared all three major procedural hurdles prior to a final vote on the legislation. * The first procedural motion passed on a 60-40 vote early Monday morning , ending debate on Sen. Reid’s proposed amendments, called the “manager’s package,” and cutting off a Republican filibuster. The “manager’s package” represented a series of last-minute deals and compromises to shore up support for the legislation. * The second procedural motion to approve the “manager’s package” passed 60-39 on Tuesday morning. * The third motion came Wednesday and ended debate on the final legislation in a 60-39 vote, setting up the reform bill for a final vote just in time for Sen. Reid’s Christmas deadline.Sen. Reid Carves Out State-Specific Deals to Secure the 60 Votes: On Saturday, Sen. Reid secured the 60 votes needed to pass the historic legislation, winning over Sen. Ben Nelson, (D-NE), with an amendment to prevent federal subsidies from being used for abortions. Under the new abortion provisions, states can opt out of allowing coverage for abortion. If states do offer coverage, enrollees must pay for abortion coverage separately – a compromise that has sparked criticism from both sides of the abortion divide. Sen. Nelson also secured other benefits for the state of Nebraska, including: * Millions of dollars from the federal government to pay for the proposed cost of the Medicaid expansion in his state; and * An exemption for Blue Cross Blue Shield of Nebraska from an annual fee on insurers. Throughout his amendment package, Sen. Reid included several other state-specific deals to secure the 60 votes. Such last-minute deals have been criticized by Republicans, including: * For Sen. Max Baucus, (D-MT), the package included a provision to help 2,900 residents of Libby, Mont., sign up for Medicare benefits. Many residents have asbestos-related illnesses; * For Sen. Christopher Dodd, (D-CT), it included a measure to provide $100 million for the construction of a hospital at a public university; * Sen. Patrick Leahy, (D-VT), negotiated for $600 million in additional Medicaid benefits for his state over 10 years; * Sen. Bernie Sanders, (I-VT), got a $10 billion increase for community health centers over a number of years; * Sen. Mary Landrieu, (D-LA), procured at least $100 million in 2011 from the federal government for help with Medicaid; and * For Sen. Bill Nelson, (D-FL), the package included a measure allowing some 800,000 Florida senior citizens currently enrolled in private Medicare Advantage plans to keep their extra benefits. Sen. Reid’s negotiations also included: * The removal of a 5 percent tax on elective cosmetic surgeries, and the inclusion of a 10 percent tax on indoor tanning services; * 12 years of patent protection for the makers of brand-name biotech drugs; * An increase in the Medicare payroll tax percent of an additional 0.9 percent of income for those making $200,000 as an individual and $250,000 for couples; * An exemption from taxes on high-value insurance plans for those with certain professions, such as firefighters, policemen, construction workers, emergency first responders and longshoremen; * A provision allowing for doctors and hospitals in Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming to get paid more than providers elsewhere; and * About $1 billion extra in Medicaid payments for visiting nurses and other in-home or community services.CBO Updates Estimates on Health Care Bill’s Impact: In a letter sent to Sen. Reid, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said that it had over-estimated the latest Senate health care bill’s impact on deficit reduction during the second decade of enactment. The original estimate indicated the overhaul would yield deficit reductions by one-half percent of GDP; the revised estimates indicate a reduction of between one-quarter and one-half percent of GDP. The CBO confirmed that its estimate over the first 10 years remains accurate, reducing the deficit by up to $132 billion by 2019.However, in a Wednesday letter to Sen. Jeffery Sessions, (R-AL), the CBO indicated that the current Senate bill may potentially double count the savings from Medicare as a means to pay for the Senate health care bill. In the letter, CBO Director Doug Elmendorf writes: “The key point is that the savings to the (Hospital Insurance) trust fund under the (Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) would be received by the government only once, so they cannot be set aside to pay for future Medicare spending and, at the same time, pay for current spending on other parts of the legislation or on other programs.” Republicans quickly jumped on the letter as proof that the Senate’s bill will not decrease the federal deficit over time, but rather add to it.Late last week, the CBO estimated that the revised Senate bill will cost $871 billion over the next decade to extend coverage to the uninsured. It would dramatically expand Medicaid and offer federal subsidies to those who lack affordable coverage through employers. The nation will pay for the overhaul with about $400 billion in new taxes and about $500 billion in cuts to programs such as Medicare.Sen. Snowe Indicates “No” Vote: Despite many weeks of negotiations with Republican Sen. Olympia Snowe of Maine and several one-on-one meetings with President Barack Obama, Sen. Snowe indicated that she will vote against the Senate’s legislation without significant changes. Sen. Snowe has been a pivotal figure in the health care reform debate as the only Republican to have voted for the Senate Finance Committee’s bill, which passed in October. The loss of Sen. Snowe’s support comes as a blow to Democratic leaders who were hoping to achieve some level of bipartisan support.Other ActivitiesAMA, AHA, AARP and FAH Show Support; AHIP Opposes: On Monday, both the American Medical Association (AMA) and the American Hospital Association ( AHA) sent letters to Sen. Reid indicating support for the latest version of the Senate health care bill, while highlighting requests for changes. The AMA, for example, hopes to see changes to the independent board that would be created to slow the growth of Medicare costs. Among other adjustments, the AHA requested a change that would lower Medicare payments to hospitals with high readmission rates. Endorsements also came from AARP and from the Federation of American Hospitals (FAH). In contrast, a statement Friday from America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) voiced opposition to the bill, citing cuts to Medicare Advantage programs and caps on insurers’ administrative costs as problematic.Public OpinionDecember Polls Show Americans Disapprove: As a final vote on the Senate’s health care reform package nears, Americans are increasingly wary of its impact. The December Kaiser Health Tracking Poll found that: * Only 35 percent of Americans said they would personally be better off if health care reform passes – down from 42 percent last month; * Only forty-five percent of voters said the country would be better off with health reform – down from 54 percent last month. The latest poll results released Tuesday from Quinnipiac University show that: * Americans “mostly disapprove” (53 percent to 36 percent) of the Senate’s plan; * A majority (56 percent to 38 percent) disapprove of President Obama’s handling of health care reform; * Voters oppose (72 percent to 23 percent) using any public money in the health care overhaul to pay for abortions; * Americans support (56 percent to 38 percent) giving people the option of coverage by a government health insurance plan; and * A majority (64 percent to 30 percent) support allowing younger people to buy into Medicare. As a volatile year in health care reform comes to a close, an average of monthly polls since April shows that 82 percent of Americans say an overhaul of the nation’s health care system is important for recharging the economy. However, in the most recent Robert Wood Johnson Foundation poll taken in November, 60 percent said an overhaul will not affect their personal access to health care or their family finances, and only about 40 percent said a revamping will improve access to care in the nation overall. Further, only about 30 percent believe health care reform will help the county’s financial status.Looking AheadSenate lawmakers are expected to vote on their final health care reform legislation early Thursday morning, setting the stage for reconciliation with the House bill passed in November. When lawmakers return from holiday break in January, the conference committee between the two chambers is expected to begin discussions about merging the two bills. Leaders of the House and Senate had hoped to have a final bill approved by Congress and sent to President Obama before the State of the Union address, scheduled for late January or early February. However, White House officials now indicate that given January’s tight legislative calendar, this timeframe is unlikely.
Posts Tagged ‘reform’
Health Insurance Exchange Reform Weekly EasyToInsureME
Sunday, February 28th, 2010The Health Insurance Reform Bill is a monstrously bad bill
Sunday, July 8th, 2007A good segment of the population have hoped that the health care reform process would do something about the three major problems of health care, spiraling out of control costs, lack of availability of insurance to much of the population, and a bureaucratic indifference that seems to have permeated the health care field.There was a good deal of hope originally for ordinary people who needed health care at a fair price. The hope was that health reforms would expand the availability of health insurance to some of the uninsured and do something to control price increases and some growing issues like a shortage of primary care providers. But, then we looked at a bill that was the product of dozens of compromises and actually ends up spinning its wheels in place. The bill is being touted as increasing insurance availability to 30million uninsured, but experts say we are actually likely to see an increase in the number of uninsured fashion forcing many Americans to drop their present coverage. Premiums, deductibles, and co-payments will continue to soar, even though we initially believed that these controls were the purpose of the reform. Ther are no guarantees that the uninsured will be able to afford new private coverage even with the promised subsidies, which will be more than three years down the road. as the expansion of Medicaid will not take place until 2013 and many states are already pushing back with concerns that the their recession-strained budgets will not allow them to pay their share in adding to their Medicaid programs, potentially leaving millions of the poorest Americans uninsured.The bill has no cost containment mechanisms for the costs of health insurance or for health care itself. In fact the insurance industy is warning that sharp premium increases will result, and these are likely to come quickly.The bill will set up a Health Benefits Advisory Committee to recommend a minimal essential benefits package that includes four tiers, insurance industry lobbyists will argue for the most minimal levels of coverage, and we can anticipate an huge number of people who are underinsured.The public option has been debated a great deal in the news, but as presently constituted it will have a minimal and a negligible role in health care reform. The Congressional Budget Office concluded it would cover only about 6 million people, which will be a very small segment of the population. By 2013, the public option will cost more than private programs, mostly due to covering sicker individuals and its inability to set reimbursement rates for physicians and hospitals as is done by Medicare. Moreover, middle-income families may be required to spend 15 to 18 percent of their income on insurance premiums and co-payments.The mega 1 trillon dollar health care bill is a potential disaster that all Americans should fear. It appearrs likely to escalate costs, limit availability of care, and do essentially all the things the political leaders promised to protect us from.More cost, less coverage, higher taxes, and a bigger burden on employers appear to be in the works.
Will the government’s proposed insurance reform increase the health insurance coverage of older Australians?: An article from: People and Place
Saturday, May 19th, 2007Product Description
This digital document is an article from People and Place, published by Monash University, Centre for Population and Urban Research on September 1, 2004. The length of the article is 4651 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Will the government’s proposed insurance reform increase the health insurance coverage of older Australians?
Author: Jeromey Temple
Publication: People and Place (Refereed)
Date: September 1, 2004
Publisher: Monash University, Centre for Population and Urban Research
Volume: 12 Issue: 3 Page: 1(9)
Distributed by Thomson Gale


