It is expected to improve physician and hospital EMR overall efficiency, reduce costs and promote standardization of care. It is also presumed to reduce medical errors and, ultimately, the quality of care. Researchers at Harvard come from a study that the first real evidence that electronic medical records has released an advantage over traditional paper systems. Services for the widespread adoption of electronic medical records seem obvious, but until recently there were few ways to illustrate them. A research group at Harvard has the body, a study shows that electronic medical records offer a substantial advantage compared to traditional paper published. In addition to health care providers for medical management software are introduced, the concept of EMR (Electronic Medical Record) for a term of household. It may also be called ESD (EMR) or PHR (Patient Health Record). A DME is essentially a list of patient records in a digital format. It contains information for each patient in terms of demographics, insurance companies, prescription records, test results, medical history, progress notes, and so on. It also contains identifiers of digital data in a database search, and with proper authorization can be accessed from any point in a medical facility or outside. TRA is believed to increase physician efficiency, reduce costs, reduce support standardization, improve quality of care and medical errors. Although they have existed for nearly 30 years, it is about 10% of health care facilities estimated using a complete software management medical system. With such a small sample, the perceived benefits have been difficult to make. In 2006, Business Week published an article on the Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Buffalo, New York. In the mid-1990s, installed, they believe that the most comprehensive system of electronic medical records in the United States, staff and patients that revolutionizes the hospital, reducing the number of errors and increases quality of care. A recent Harvard study shows that the use of electronic health records or electronic health records can reduce malpractice claims. The study showed that the Sixth 1% of physicians who use EMR had a malpractice claim, compared to 10 8%, the traditional paper cards. In the United States an estimated 100,000 deaths occur each year due to medical errors. These medical errors are often the result of misunderstandings, errors of transcription, side effects and incomplete patient records. FSD ensure that physicians have avoided an immediate and universal access to complete patient medical history and improving communication between general practitioners, specialists, nurses and other health care workers to costly mistakes. According to the industry standard, “said lead researcher Steven Simon, MD, MPH,” The results of this study that the prevention of medical malpractice claims may be another reason for doctors, practices and policies promote efforts towards a general acceptance and optimal use of electronic health records possible. “Simon and his team are a group of people working hard on promoting the widespread adoption of EMR. The VA hospital in Buffalo is a perfect example of successful transition to a system of management practice. Companies such as e-MDS are hard at work to support this movement with a revolutionary medical management software. Congress Peter Stark is the way with the Health-e Information Technology Act of 2008 presented to House last September. As the number of fans increases that follow, we hope to raise awareness and funding. The advantages of EMR will be implemented over time and with the universal adoption.