Posts Tagged ‘Number’

Table 8.C3–hospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance: number of participating skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, Clinical … An article from: Social Security Bulletin

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Product Description
This digital document is an article from Social Security Bulletin, published by Thomson Gale on January 1, 2006. The length of the article is 891 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Table 8.C3–hospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance: number of participating skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, Clinical Laboratory Improvement Act facilities, and end-stage renal disease facilities, by census division and state or other area, December 2005.(8.C Medicare: Participating Facilities)(Table)
Author: Gale Reference Team
Publication: Social Security Bulletin (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2006
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Page: 8.32(2)

Article Type: Table

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Table 8.C3–hospital insurance and/or supplementary medical insurance: number of participating skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, Clinical … An article from: Social Security Bulletin

Hospitals to Obama: Take a Number, Take a Seat

Saturday, March 13th, 2010

Medical and insurance industry pundits agree the transition to electronic medical records will result in substantial cost savings for patients. Huge medical groups and publicly-traded hospital corporations — the first healthcare groups to turn mountains of paperwork into racks of computer servers — talk about millions of dollars in annual paperless savings with their shareholders.

But some hospitals and doctors think the Obama administration is moving too fast in its efforts to promote the transition to electronic health records, according to the New England Journal of Medicine.

At issue is a proposed regulation that spells out what hospitals and health providers must do in order to receive incentive payments for “meaningful use” of electronic health records. Thanks to the economic stimulus legislation, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) will pay up to $17 billion starting in 2011 to hospitals, doctors and other health providers that meet these standards.

To be clear about what amounts to an economic mandate, by 2015, Obama has authorized CMS to cut Medicare reimbursements to hospitals and providers that aren’t “meaningful users” of electronic medical records. What isn’t clear is what “meaningful users” may eventually mean. For now though, CMS just released a list of some 20 electronic medical records standards that providers must meet in order to qualify for the incentive payments.

After a few weeks of reflection, the American Hospital Association balked at the standards. The proposed rules are too stringent, the organization contents, and would penalize hospitals that already are using technology to reduce medication errors, track outcomes and collect basic patient health information without a mandate or incentive to do so.

“As proposed, the current regulations may actually make it more difficult for hospitals and doctors to adopt health information technology,” said Rick Pollack, the association’s executive vice president. “Unless significant changes are made and timelines re-examined, it is unlikely that the vast majority of hospitals can meet the proposed standards.”

While experts believe the expanded use of electronic records will improve the quality and efficiency of health care, and improve patient safety, hospital administrators and physicians know all too well that the process will amount to more than simply scanning pages and moving on. In a government-funded survey published last year by the New England Journal of Medicine, only about 17 percent of all doctors in the United States are currently using an electronic medical records system.

Some believe that once the medical record transition gets going, peer pressure will drive compliance.

“Electronic medical records will accelerate and facilitate health information technology adoption by more individual providers and organizations throughout the health care system,” said Dr. David Blumenthal, national coordinator for health information technology, in a recent interview with New York Times.

Since three-fourths of U.S. doctors work in small practices not aligned with deep pockets of hospital corporations or insurance companies, the conversion to electronic medical records amounts to a major cost that’s long deferred. Technology isn’t the problem. Money, time and training are the culprits.

“There’s no way small practices can effectively implement electronic health records on their own,” said Dr. Farzad Mostashari, assistant commissioner for the New York City health department. “This is not the iPhone.”

Code Red: Texas In Crisis Over Number Of Uninsured

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

The American populace has been sufficiently bombarded by information on the “health insurance crisis,” the “healthcare crisis,” the “community crisis.” Despite living in a country where everyone is supposedly entitled to equal access, another horrifying and dismal piece of information seems to be released almost everyday on the declining state of healthcare for the uninsured and underinsured,
The uninsured die more often, receive less preventative care, less therapeutic care, and are diagnosed at more advanced stages of disease than the insured. One-third of those who went without insurance did not receive a recommended test or treatment due to cost in 2004, three to four times the rate of the insured. Texas is the hardest hit, with 25% of its population currently uninsured, in some areas more like 33%. What we have to ask now, knowing we have a major problem on our hands, is what all this actually means for those who lack individual health insurance.
It means that hospitals, clinics, and emergency rooms are shutting down across the country, including in major cities like Dallas and Houston, due to lack of funding, in part because of covering the costs of treating uninsured who had nowhere else to go. It means you may not have an emergency room in your community next year.
The number of doctors no longer accepting Medicaid “the government’s free insurance program for the low-income” is climbing, and the number of those accepted to the program is decreasing, due to a 2006 Congressional approval of $46.1 billion in budget cuts to the program over the next ten years. That means those foregoing needed medical attention, including those in Texas, because they simply can’t afford it, is also on the rise. The extent of this situation is difficult to even estimate, because those who don’t have insurance are less likely to get checked, and those who don’t at least attempt to receive care don’t make it into most of the studies. That means if, like so many, you are uninsured, this could be you.
According to the U.S. Census Bureau, 46 million, or 15.7% of the population, went without health insurance in 2004. Almost one-third of the non-elderly went without in 2002-2003 – 43% for Texas – and millions more were considered underinsured in the same years.
Texas has the highest percentage of uninsured adults, working adults, and children, only a portion of whom are actually in poverty. According to the Institute of Medicine, a large percentage of the uninsured are working individuals who can sustain themselves, but who cannot afford health coverage due to rising costs; premiums alone have increased an average of 15% over the last five years nationally, and employee spending for healthcare increased by 143% between 2000 and 2005.
It’s difficult, particularly for young people, to conceptualize the consequences of not having individual health insurance until a catastrophe, even a small one, hits.
“Yeah, it’s horrible,” grumbles David*, a construction worker who has worked in Arizona, Texas, and New Mexico. “There’s always work in the Southwest because the weather is so great, but most of the time I can’t do it anymore because of this,” he says, aggravated, pointing at his midsection. “It’s not the worst thing that could have happened to me, but it’s definitely one of the more damaging to my career.”
David, 29, suffered a hernia four months ago, a condition that is usually not life-threatening, but inhibits a person from performing certain activities, including heavy lifting. With no individual health insurance of his own, the only way it will be treated properly is if he can somehow pay for the expensive surgery himself. “Medicaid won’t cover me because my average income is too high, workers’ comp won’t cover me because it didn’t happen on the job, and the hospitals won’t cover me because it’s not a life-threatening situation. I don’t have my own insurance because the premiums are too high. So what am I supposed to do? Construction is the only skill I have.”
What this translates into, practically, is that David now has to choose between the lesser of two evils. He risks serious injury by taking assignments requiring heavy lifting – almost all construction jobs – but not working means he can’t pay the bills. As a high school graduate who went directly into construction, he has little experience outside of the field, and no other skilled trades. “It’s either this or fast food.”
Texas, with the highest rate of uninsured and some of the strictest guidelines to qualify for Medicaid, is a prime example of how difficult receiving adequate healthcare is without coverage. While Medicaid and the State Children’s Health Insurance Program is largely the state’s responsibility for those who actually make the cut, care for medically indigent patients is the county’s responsibility, and funding across the state varies widely. Some counties only provide for those without any, or with extremely low, incomes – which means that cities like Dallas, Houston, San Antonio, and Austin are absorbing the cost of patients coming in from other parts of the state. But Texas cities have their own problems; 28% of Houston residents, for instance, are uninsured themselves.
And the problem is not just with healthcare, but with all the aspects of personal life and the economy that poor health can affect. Poor health, for a notable example, negatively impacts educational status, which, in turn, negatively impacts health. The problem is so urgent in Texas that a Task Force of ten of the state’s academic institutions was created to address the crisis. The Task Force concluded – among other things – that, “in the absence of vigorous initiatives” to correct the situation, hospitals and emergency rooms will continue to close, the state’s economic power will decrease, and both state and county budgets will spin into crises.
So what does this Code Red for Texas mean exactly? It means that if you’re uninsured, you have less access to care, lower quality of care when you get it, and a higher chance of the care you get being too little, too late. It means that if you’re unfortunate enough to contract cancer while uninsured, you are statistically more likely to get diagnosed at a later stage of disease, more likely to receive less therapeutic (i.e., effective) care, and, sadly, more likely to die. It means that if you’re uninsured and diagnosed with HIV, or diabetes, or high blood pressure, you will probably suffer a similar fate.
Texas’ Code Red also means that, under the current conditions of the economy and healthcare system, you’re statistically more likely to survive, or suffer less severe consequences of a disease, if you invest in health insurance. While the country, of course, needs to fight the dysfunction that created this terrible situation, you had best protect yourself. It could literally be a matter of survival.

The Face of AMERICA – BINGO! It has been called “keno”, “screeno” and “beano.” Its most vommon name, “bingo,” was coined by a toy salesman in 1929, and bingo has been coining money for sweet charity ever since. Organized bingo thrives today in church auditoriums, on military installations and at carnivals – even though it is illegal in most states. Robert Meyner’s probingo plank was a real factor in his successful bid for the governorship of New Jersey in 1953. That same year in New York, Governor Dewey vetoed a bingo bill – but the voters soon overruled him. Today, bingo fans in the Albany-Schenectady area are able to get a little action at the weekly game run by the Village of Colonie Volunteer Fire Department. Some 300 players spend more than two dollars each for a little excitement and a chance at cash prizes of up to $125. The net “take” buys improvements for the fire company and rescue squad. The most avid fans are the matrons of the community. They stop playing when a fire or ambulance siren sounds, but as the wail diminishes, the game resumes in earnest. Down-state, in aplace called Brooklyn, the girls take their bingo even more seriously: Last year 1500 players were involved in a near riot at a hospital-benefit affair when they suspected that No. 36 was missing from the number scrambler. Photograph by George Burns. ….. 1959 Saturday Evening Post Picture, A5862A. 19590926

Saturday, February 13th, 2010

Product Description
This Item is an original 2 page Magazine picture, taken from a vintage magazine of the year indicated. The picture is suitable for framing and displaying in your home or office. The scan of this item was taken through plastic film, however it is an accurate representation of the item. The nominal size is 21.0 inches by 14 inches.

The Face of AMERICA – BINGO! It has been called “keno”, “screeno” and “beano.” Its most vommon name, “bingo,” was coined by a toy salesman in 1929, and bingo has been coining money for sweet charity ever since. Organized bingo thrives today in church auditoriums, on military installations and at carnivals – even though it is illegal in most states. Robert Meyner’s probingo plank was a real factor in his successful bid for the governorship of New Jersey in 1953. That same year in New York, Governor Dewey vetoed a bingo bill – but the voters soon overruled him. Today, bingo fans in the Albany-Schenectady area are able to get a little action at the weekly game run by the Village of Colonie Volunteer Fire Department. Some 300 players spend more than two dollars each for a little excitement and a chance at cash prizes of up to $125. The net “take” buys improvements for the fire company and rescue squad. The most avid fans are the matrons of the community. They stop playing when a fire or ambulance siren sounds, but as the wail diminishes, the game resumes in earnest. Down-state, in aplace called Brooklyn, the girls take their bingo even more seriously: Last year 1500 players were involved in a near riot at a hospital-benefit affair when they suspected that No. 36 was missing from the number scrambler. Photograph by George Burns. ….. 1959 Saturday Evening Post Picture, A5862A. 19590926

Table 8.B5–hospital Insurance and/or Supplementary Medical Insurance: Number of enrollees under age 65 who are disabled or have end-stage renal disease, … An article from: Social Security Bulletin

Monday, February 8th, 2010

Product Description
This digital document is an article from Social Security Bulletin, published by Thomson Gale on January 1, 2006. The length of the article is 1397 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: Table 8.B5–hospital Insurance and/or Supplementary Medical Insurance: Number of enrollees under age 65 who are disabled or have end-stage renal disease, by program, age, sex, and race, July 1, 1980-2005, selected years.(8.B Medicare: Enrollment, Utilization, and Reimbursement)(Table)
Author: Gale Reference Team
Publication: Social Security Bulletin (Magazine/Journal)
Date: January 1, 2006
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Page: 8.15(2)

Article Type: Table

Distributed by Thomson Gale

Table 8.B5–hospital Insurance and/or Supplementary Medical Insurance: Number of enrollees under age 65 who are disabled or have end-stage renal disease, … An article from: Social Security Bulletin