Product DescriptionThis digital document is an article from units of the National Association Published first apartment in December 2008. The length of the article is 2773 words. The length of the page above on a typical 300-word side. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser. Citation Details Title: 2009′s apartment buildings: Legal: This year will focus on the dispute which has created withdrew funds for development projects, insurance needs and accessibility compliance. Author: A. Morgan StewartPublication: Units (Magazine / Journal) Date: December 1 2008Publisher: National Apartment AssociationVolume: 32 Number: 12 Page: 32 (6) Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
Posts Tagged ‘legal’
2009 Multi-family: Legal Perspective: In this year of the dispute had withdrawn the funding for development projects designed to focus coverage. . . Compliance. : An article from: Units
Wednesday, July 28th, 2010Legal aspects of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement: Payment of hospital and medical
Tuesday, July 13th, 2010FL: hospital ignored the proposal for a regulation has provided more than 160,000 in legal fees from the hospital. : An article from: Hospital Law Regan Report
Monday, July 12th, 2010Product DescriptionThis digital document is an article of the Law Regan Report Thomson Gale Hospital on 1 December 2007 Published. The length of the article is 592 words. The length of the page above on a 300-word page type. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon. com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser. Citation Details Title: FL: hospital’s proposal for the settlement ignored: over $ 160,000 in legal fees awarded hospital. (Hospital Law Decisions of Note) (summary of cases) Author: David A. TammelleoPublication: Law Hospital Regan Report (Newsletter) Date: December 1 2007Publisher Thomson GaleVolume: 48 Issue: 7 Page: 3 (1) Article Type: Case overviewDistributed The Thomson Gale
Legal issues affecting physician-recruitment relationships
Sunday, July 11th, 2010In general, two of the most important laws that relate to recruitment rules: (1) The Federal Republic “Stark” law and (2) The Federal Ministry of the Anti-kickback and safe haven for members of Physician recruitment.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY RECRUITING HIGH-PHSYICIAN
The federal Stark law prohibits a doctor for a referral to an entity for the establishment of “designated health services” (DHS) and the company to apply for the service if there is a financial relationship between doctor DHS and the company, unless there is an exception. There is an exception for physician recruitment. Under Stark, a hospital is authorized to pay a doctor at the hospital for the geographic area to be the doctor, a medical staff of the hospital.
In particular, the Framework Agreement, the following conditions
(1) The device shall be in writing and signed by both parties;
(2) The order may be conditioned on the medical payments;
(3) The amount of compensation under the agreement can not be considered a way (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of transfers is determined by the doctor, and
(4) The physician must provide staff privileges at another hospital to create and access businesses in other locations.
Moving:
A hospital is permitted to pay a doctor at the hospital for the geographical area. To move to meet demand, the doctor must:
(1) Move the practice a minimum of 25 (25) miles or
(2) At least seventy-five percent (75%) of the physician, the need for care recipes, come to new patients.
Note, however, the Stark regulations provide special treatment for residents and new physicians (doctors who have been in practice less than a year). These physicians are eligible except the recruitment of physicians, regardless of whether they actually move their practices.
Location:
As regards the geographical area, assembled, the rules of the geographical area defined by the hospital as the smallest number of contiguous zip codes, was transferred from the hospital at least 75% of hospitalized patients. The requirement of the geographical area dictates both the region from which the doctors of the hospital does not recruit, but also as a space to move in which the physician must recruit his practice.
Payments to a physician who joins a group:
The Stark regulations, additional conditions when setting pay (1) indirectly by another physician or group practice, or (2) directly to a doctor who join an existing group or physician practice. With these additional conditions, the following conditions must be met:
(1) The agreement between the hospital and physicians’ offices is in writing and signed by the parties, in a situation where a medical practice includes a variety of recruitment contract is a tripartite agreement signed by the hospital recruitment doctors and home PC or PLLC;
(2) The payment is made to pass directly through, or the physician selected (except for actual costs incurred by the practice of recruiting the new physician);
(3) guarantee in the case of income to the hospital to a physician, a physician practice that combines local, the cost of physician practice to the physician selected is assigned, is not due to the additional actual costs the practice of physician recruitment;
(4) The new doctor has a medical practice in the clinic as geographical area and join the hospital medical staff;
(5) The practice of consultation with the doctor hired must be specified in writing and signed by the parties;
(6) The new physician can be required to submit patients to the hospital and has privileges at another hospital staff to create and refer to other business agencies;
(7) The remuneration of a hospital, do not take into account (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of referrals (or expected) by the physician or physician practice game receiving direct payments from the hospital identified (or any other doctor with the doctor’s office is connected;
(8) The practice of doctors receiving payments from the hospital can not compete not to impose additional restrictions on medical practice (as a commitment), but can not impose conditions on the qualitative and
(9) The system can not comply with the anti-kickback and should be with all laws and accounting rules.
FEDERAL harbors anti-kickback safe and LAW
Under the federal anti-kickback is a person knowingly and willingly promote or receive prohibited from paying the tender or payment of compensation in consideration for reference or make recommendations for goods and services under federal programs. However, there is a “regulatory safe harbor that protects physician recruitment payments. Note, however, that contrary to Stark, the Federal Republic of anti-kickback safe harbor applies to the establishment of payments Adjustment to a shortage of health sector professional installation inducing (“HPSA”). The safe harbor does not protect payments recruitment through the development in areas that are not designated as HPSAs. The parameter “safe harbor applies to payments by a corporation to a doctor who had been in his current practice specialty find for less than a year, or induce any other practitioner to relocate to organize its principal place of practice a HPSA for his area of specialty that is served by the company as the following conditions are met:
Remarkably, the anti-kickback statue intent, which has been interpreted broadly, an agreement, aims to encourage referrals belong. Regulation Safe Harbor define practices not subject to the anti-kickback, but because it is a game of “safe harbor, not per se unlawful agreement. Instead, the facts and circumstances surrounding the arrangement to be carefully considered. In this regard, although there is no shelter that applies to the adjustment of payments outside the HPSA context, it may reduce the risk if all other requirements of the Safe Harbor that are HPSA issues met.
Summary
Doctors involved in the recruitment process should be designed, taking into account the complex legal requirements. Violations of the Stark and anti-kickback law are severe. Each doctor examined a deal for recruitment should the opinion of experienced prosecutor to ensure that laws are respected and sought protection in the agreements, the physician should be terminated.
http://www. racattorneys. com
Legal Immigrants Still Lack Care In Massachusetts
Friday, July 2nd, 2010News outlets report on legal immigrants and the cost of health reform in Massachusetts, new hospital fees in Ohio, coverage shortfalls in Tennessee and registered nurse practitioners in Florida.The Boston Globe: “More than 100 legal immigrants who were supposed to start receiving care yesterday under a new state health insurance plan will have to wait because the contractor hired to run the program has been unable to reach agreement with providers in Western Massachusetts. The immigrants, 123 in Pittsfield and 16 in Adams, are among roughly 5,000 in western and central Massachusetts who became eligible yesterday for coverage under the CeltiCare Health Plan of Massachusetts. But CeltiCare has been unable to negotiate contracts with hospitals in those two cities, said a state spokesman, Richard Powers” (Lazar, 12/2).WBUR: “When people debate the status of Massachusetts health reform, the key question tends to be: Is it affordable? More than 97 percent of all people in the state now have health insurance. Some of them get it through state-subsidized health plans, but those subsidies cost nearly a billion dollars a year. Some critics say that has come at the expense of other needs, one of them being the state’s safety net hospitals. Those are the hospitals that serve mostly poor patients, and many of them are in western Massachusetts and other places outside Boston” (Pfeiffer and Brown, 12/1).The Associated Press/Hudson Hub-Times: “Ohio hospitals, which have been cutting staff and medical services amid the recession, are bracing for a new state fee that began Nov. 30. The new franchise fee is based on a percentage of operating expenses at each hospital. It is expected to raise $718 million to help balance the state budget. Federal money will help offset most of the cost because hospitals will be partially reimbursed with higher Medicaid payments. But hospitals will have to find a way to cover the remaining $145 million” (12/2).The Tennessean: “As state funds run dry, Tennessee has cut off enrollment for two health insurance programs for low-income people, leaving the state at risk of a crisis, advocates say. Tennessee became the only state in the nation to have frozen enrollment for a children’s health insurance program funded largely with federal money, according to the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities in Washington, D.C. The state stopped accepting new CoverKids applicants on Monday. At the same time, the state stopped enrolling adults in CoverTN, an insurance program designed for the self-employed and working poor. … With a projected $1.5 billion shortfall in the state’s $29 billion budget and every department facing cuts, there is no extra money to go around” (Sanchez and Ross, 12/2).Orlando Sentinel: “Every year for the past 16 years, the Florida Nurses Association has lobbied unsuccessfully to allow its most highly trained colleagues the right to prescribe painkillers and other controlled substances. When the new legislative session starts in March, the nurses once again will wage their war against the Florida Medical Association — the group that represents doctors and is opposed to changing the law. But this time, the nurses will have a battlefield advantage. They will be armed with a 2008 state Senate report that recommends giving qualified registered nurse practitioners authority to write prescriptions for controlled substances. The number of states that prohibit such authority has shrunk to just two: Florida and Alabama” (Quintero, 12/2).Health News Florida: “Florida’s Attorney General’s office has filed suit against a Tampa firm that it says made and sold more than 1,000 pricey back-pain therapy machines to physicians nationwide through ‘false, deceptive or misleading advertising.’ Most of the doctors were chiropractors.” The company is Axiom Worldwide, and Health News Florida notes that “Among other misleading statements, the complaint filed Nov. 19 in Hillsborough Circuit Court says, Axiom called its DRX 9000 spinal decompression system ‘the eighth wonder of the world’” (Gentry, 12/1).The Florida Times-Union reports on a Jacksonville area program that is designed to “steer people who get most of their medical care in emergency rooms into a doctor’s office” instead. “The people who joined the program in April and May were a sick bunch, having been hospitalized a total of 41 days over the previous three months. One of the program’s goals is to envelop such patients in a ‘system of care’ … that aims to prevent chronic health problems from sending these patients to a hospital.” The effort is part of increasing national emphasis on prevention of medical problems. “President Barack Obama, for one, has emphasized repeatedly the importance of including wellness initiatives in a reform plan. Millions in economic stimulus money went toward creating and expanding preventive-care programs, and both health overhaul bills before the House and Senate are loaded with preventive measures” (Cox, 12/1).
Legal Issues Impacting Physician Recruitment Relationships
Saturday, June 12th, 2010In general, two of the primary laws that are applicable to recruitment arrangements are: (1) the Federal “Stark” law; and (2) the Federal Anti-kickback law and the accompanying safe harbor for physician recruitment.
FEDERAL STARK –PHSYICIAN RECRUTIMENT EXCEPTION
The Federal Stark law prohibits a physician from making a referral to an entity for the furnishing of “designated health services” (“DHS”) and the entity from submitting a claim for the service if there is a financial relationship between the physician and the DHS entity, unless an exception exists. An exception exists for physician recruitment. Under Stark, a hospital is permitted to pay a physician to relocate to the hospital’s geographic area in order for the physician to be a member of the hospital’s medical staff.
Specifically, the recruitment arrangement must meet the following requirements
(1) The arrangement is set out in writing and signed by both parties;
(2) The arrangement cannot be conditioned on the physician’s referrals;
(3) The amount of remuneration under the agreement may not be determined in a manner that takes into account (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of any referrals by the physician; and
(4) The physician must be allowed to establish staff privileges at any other hospital and to refer business to other entities.
Relocation:
A hospital is permitted to pay a physician to relocate to the hospital’s geographic area. In order to meet the relocation requirement, the physician must:
(1) Relocate his/ her practice a minimum of twenty-five (25) miles; or
(2) At least seventy-five percent (75%) of the physician’s revenues must come from care provided to new patients.
Note, however, the Stark regulations afford special treatment to residents and new physicians (physicians who have been in practice less than one year). These physicians will be eligible for the physician recruitment exception regardless of whether they actually move their practices.
Geographic Area:
With regard to the geographic area, the regulations define the geographic area served by the hospital as the area composed of the lowest number of contiguous zip codes from which the hospital draws at least 75% of its inpatients. The geographic area requirement dictates both the area from which the hospital may not recruit established physicians, and also as an area within which the recruited physician must relocate his/her practice.
Payments Made to a Physician Who Joins a Group:
The Stark regulations add additional conditions when a recruitment payment is made (1) indirectly through another physician or group practice or (2) directly to a physician who is joining an existing physician or group practice. To meet these additional conditions, the following requirements must be met:
(1) The arrangement between the hospital and physician practice is in writing and signed by the parties: in a situation where a physician joins a host practice, the recruitment contract will be a three- party agreement signed by the hospital, recruited physician and host PC or PLLC;
(2) The remuneration is passed directly through to, or remains with, the recruited physician (except for actual costs incurred by the practice in recruiting the new physician);
(3) In the case of an income guarantee made by the hospital to a physician who joins a local physician practice, costs allocated by the physician practice to the recruited physician may not exceed the actual additional incremental costs to the practice attributable to the recruited physician;
(4) The new physician must establish a medical practice in the hospital’s geographic area and join the hospital’s medical staff;
(5) The practice’s arrangement with the recruited physician must be set out in writing and signed by the parties;
(6) The new physician may not be required to refer patients to the hospital and is allowed to establish staff privileges at any other hospital and to refer business to other entities;
(7) The remuneration from the hospital is not determined in any manner that takes into account (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of any referrals (actual or anticipated) by the recruited physician or by the physician practice receiving the direct payments from the hospital (or any physician affiliated with that physician practice;
(8) The physician practice receiving the hospital payments may not impose additional practice restrictions on the recruited physician (e.g., a covenant not to compete), but may impose conditions related solely to quality considerations; and
(9) The arrangement must not violate the anti-kickback statute and must comply with all relevant billing laws and regulations.
FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK LAW AND SAFE HARBOR
Under the Federal Anti-kickback law, a person is prohibited from knowingly and willfully soliciting or receiving, offering or paying any remuneration in return for referring or inducing referrals for goods and services paid for under federal government programs. However, there is a regulatory safe harbor that protects physician recruitment payments. Of note, however, is that unlike Stark, the Federal Anti-kickback safe harbor applies to recruitment payments to induce recruitment into a health care professional shortage area (“HPSA”). The safe harbor does not protect recruitment payments in connection with recruitment into areas that are not designated as HPSAs. The recruitment safe harbor applies to payments by an entity in order to induce a practitioner who has been practicing within his or her current specialty for less than one year to locate, or to induce any other practitioner to relocate, his or her primary place of practice into a HPSA for his or her specialty area that is served by the entity, as long as the following requirements are met:
Notably, the Anti-kickback statute is an intent based statue, which is broadly worded and has been interpreted to include any arrangement, one purpose of which is to induce referrals. The safe harbor regulations define practices that are not subject to the Anti-kickback statute but failure to comply with a safe harbor, does not make an arrangement per se illegal. Instead, the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the arrangement must be carefully scrutinized. In this regard, although there is not a safe harbor that applies to recruitment payments outside of the HPSA context, it may reduce risk if all of the other requirements of the safe harbor, which do not involve HPSA issues, are met.
Summary
Physicians involved in recruitment arrangements must be mindful of the complex legal requirements. Violations of the Stark and the Anti-kickback law are severe. Any physician contemplating entering into a recruitment arrangement should seek the advice of experienced counsel to ensure that the laws are complied with and in order to obtain protections in the agreements should the physician be terminated.
Is Bankruptcy the End of the Road? Legal Advice You Can Use to Climb Out of the Hole
Saturday, March 13th, 2010When the modifications to U.S. Bankruptcy Code made it more difficult for people to declare bankruptcy and have debts forgiven, many consumer rights activists cried foul. The credit industry worked hard to get this passed, and at first blush, it does appear to work against debtors.On the other hand, the changes did debtors a favor in some respects. By making it harder to seek bankruptcy protection, the new laws made it mandatory that those who might not need to declare bankruptcy go through credit counseling and enter a repayment plan if possible. The changes also revealed just how desperate creditors are to keep your debts from being written off completely. Armed with that knowledge, there are ways to avoid bankruptcy and right your personal financial ship.Pennies on the DollarEveryone has seen or heard ads for law firms or other agencies that will work with creditors and settle your debts for virtually nothing. This can happen, but there are some caveats. One is that many such agencies are not reliable or trustworthy. If they are full-fledged law firms, they will have some oversight from the state supreme court’s disciplinary counsel, as well as the local bar association. Even so, be wary and investigate before signing on with anyone.Further, these agencies collect your money for a time without paying your creditors. Your accounts will get further behind while you pay them, knocking your credit score down nearly as much as a bankruptcy would. If you are struggling to make ends meet but paying on time or nearly so, this is a fairly unpalatable option.Finally, to the extent that these agencies do help, you may be able to do the same for yourself. While some creditors are more willing than others to settle for lower dollar amounts, any of them would rather take something than nothing. Thus, if you are already that far behind, you might try saving yourself some fees that would be charged by the agencies by negotiating for yourself.Credit CounselingAn adage that has been unfairly applied to lawyers is true in the area of credit counselors; 99 percent of them give the rest a bad name. Class action suits against these groups abound, and internet message boards are full of angry stories. A good credit counseling agency can help immensely.The way such agencies work is to work out a payment plan with you based on what you can afford. They then apply it to paying off your creditors based on preset rate reductions. They are funded by the credit industry, which is a major turn off for some people. However, the credit industry pays them to do something that helps the consumer; they help you pay your accounts off, at a lower interest rate than you might get otherwise.Again, many of these agencies are unreliable, paying late or not at all. Many creditors, upon your telling them you plan to work through a credit counseling agency, will try to talk you out of it for this reason. When they do, listen. You may be able to work out a better deal for yourself than the agency could. The creditors want to be paid to the extent possible; they have no incentive to ruin your credit by forcing you into bankruptcy.If you do decide to go through a credit counselor, investigate first. Is the agency accredited? What complaints against them have been filed with the Better Business Bureau and how have they been resolved? Find a place you can trust.ConclusionThere are ways to avoid bankruptcy in most cases. If you have lost everything with uninsured hospital bills, that is one thing. Being behind on your bills and overextended on credit need not push most people over that edge. Creditors want you solvent so they can collect something; you want yourself solvent so you can obtain credit again someday. The U.S. government wants you solvent so you can contribute to the economy. Look into your options and you will learn that you can usually find your way out of the bankruptcy hole before you hit bottom.
Legal Aspects of Medicare and Medicaid Reimbursement: Payment for Hospital and Physician Services
Wednesday, February 24th, 2010Personal Injury Hospital Bills–How Legal Services Can Help
Sunday, February 14th, 2010It does not happen in any other industrialized nation – but in the U.S., because of the nature of the profit-driven health care industry, medical and hospital bills due to personal injury can cause victims and their families extreme financial hardship – even bankruptcy and the loss of a home.It’s not right, it’s not fair – but since lawmakers in Washington D.C. are little inclined to change the system, the only recourse for those in the Denver area who are in this situation is to obtain the services of a Denver personal injury lawyer.How Legal Services Can HelpThe area of personal injury law is very broad and covers a wide range of situations that range from property damages to injuries done to one’s reputation (i.e., slander and libel). In extreme cases, it addresses situations in which one has lost a family member because of someone else’s negligence. In this case, a Colorado wrongful death lawyer can assist in getting some kind of compensation from the party responsible.A personal injury or wrongful death suit does not usually involve illegal or criminal activities (although they can be – and these components are dealt with separately in the criminal courts). In most cases, the injury or death has occurred because of either:• carelessness or negligence on the part of the party responsible• a defective or toxic product In the case of the latter, a Denver wrongful death lawyer would go after the manufacturer of the product. In the former case, the lawyer will file suit against either the individual, his/her insurer and/or a business (for example, if an employee of John’s Widgets, Inc. had caused the injury or death while on the clock and performing his/her duties, the company would bear the liability).The important thing about winning a personal injury or wrongful death suit is to prove that the party being held responsible had a “duty of care” toward the injured party and had failed to exercise that duty. Proving this in civil court can be challenging and the law has numerous “gray areas” in these matters – so it’s a good idea to have a Denver personal injury lawyer to represent you.Obtaining ServicesFortunately, if you are injured or have lost a loved on because of another’s negligence, you will not have to come up with money to retain the services of a Colorado wrongful death lawyer or other legal professional. The lawyers will review your case for free, and if it is determined to have merit, will take the case on a “contingency basis.” This means that all lawyer’s fees will be a percentage of any court award (usually about one-third); you will pay nothing unless your Denver personal injury lawyer wins your case.
Multifamily housing’s 2009: legal outlook: this year will focus on litigation created by withdrawn funding for development projects, insurance coverage … compliance.: An article from: Units
Sunday, September 16th, 2007Product Description
This digital document is an article from Units, published by National Apartment Association on December 1, 2008. The length of the article is 2773 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Multifamily housing’s 2009: legal outlook: this year will focus on litigation created by withdrawn funding for development projects, insurance coverage provisions and accessibility compliance.
Author: Morgan A. Stewart
Publication: Units (Magazine/Journal)
Date: December 1, 2008
Publisher: National Apartment Association
Volume: 32 Issue: 12 Page: 32(6)
Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning


