Product DescriptionThis digital document is an article in the Journal of Economic Issues, by the Association for Evolutionary Economics 1 Published in June 2000. The length of the article is 3339 words. The length of the page above on a 300-word page type. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon. com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser. Citation Details Title: Access, choice and household income: a comparison of health insurance to workers and the standard non-standard. (Statistical Data Included) Author: Carolyn B. RodriguezPublication: Journal of Economic Issues (Refereed) Date: June 1 2000Publisher: Association for Evolutionary Economic Volume: 34 Issue: 2 Page: 499Article Type: Statistical data from Thomson Gale IncludedDistributed
Posts Tagged ‘Issues’
To access, choice, and household income: a comparison of health insurance for workers and non-standard standard. : An article from: Journal of Economic Issues
Sunday, July 25th, 2010Fiscal year 1988 budget reconciliation issues for reimbursement of capital expenditures of hospitals under the Medicare program: Hearing before. . . Congress, first session, May 4, 1987
Friday, July 16th, 2010Product DescriptionThis volume of digital images by the University of Michigan University Library digitization efforts created large-scale production. The library is the intellectual content of elements in a way that facilitates and encourages a variety of applications to obtain. The numerical results in reformatting an electronic version of the original text, both online and recovered and used to create new designs can be created. The library also includes the values and benefits of the printing and reprinting is available to the public whenever possible. This book and hundreds of thousands of others can HathiTrust, an archive of digitized collections of many major research libraries are located. To access the University of Michigan Digital Library Collections, see http://www. lib. UMich. edu for information on HathiTrust, please visit http://www. hathitrust. org
Legal issues affecting physician-recruitment relationships
Sunday, July 11th, 2010In general, two of the most important laws that relate to recruitment rules: (1) The Federal Republic “Stark” law and (2) The Federal Ministry of the Anti-kickback and safe haven for members of Physician recruitment.
FEDERAL EMERGENCY RECRUITING HIGH-PHSYICIAN
The federal Stark law prohibits a doctor for a referral to an entity for the establishment of “designated health services” (DHS) and the company to apply for the service if there is a financial relationship between doctor DHS and the company, unless there is an exception. There is an exception for physician recruitment. Under Stark, a hospital is authorized to pay a doctor at the hospital for the geographic area to be the doctor, a medical staff of the hospital.
In particular, the Framework Agreement, the following conditions
(1) The device shall be in writing and signed by both parties;
(2) The order may be conditioned on the medical payments;
(3) The amount of compensation under the agreement can not be considered a way (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of transfers is determined by the doctor, and
(4) The physician must provide staff privileges at another hospital to create and access businesses in other locations.
Moving:
A hospital is permitted to pay a doctor at the hospital for the geographical area. To move to meet demand, the doctor must:
(1) Move the practice a minimum of 25 (25) miles or
(2) At least seventy-five percent (75%) of the physician, the need for care recipes, come to new patients.
Note, however, the Stark regulations provide special treatment for residents and new physicians (doctors who have been in practice less than a year). These physicians are eligible except the recruitment of physicians, regardless of whether they actually move their practices.
Location:
As regards the geographical area, assembled, the rules of the geographical area defined by the hospital as the smallest number of contiguous zip codes, was transferred from the hospital at least 75% of hospitalized patients. The requirement of the geographical area dictates both the region from which the doctors of the hospital does not recruit, but also as a space to move in which the physician must recruit his practice.
Payments to a physician who joins a group:
The Stark regulations, additional conditions when setting pay (1) indirectly by another physician or group practice, or (2) directly to a doctor who join an existing group or physician practice. With these additional conditions, the following conditions must be met:
(1) The agreement between the hospital and physicians’ offices is in writing and signed by the parties, in a situation where a medical practice includes a variety of recruitment contract is a tripartite agreement signed by the hospital recruitment doctors and home PC or PLLC;
(2) The payment is made to pass directly through, or the physician selected (except for actual costs incurred by the practice of recruiting the new physician);
(3) guarantee in the case of income to the hospital to a physician, a physician practice that combines local, the cost of physician practice to the physician selected is assigned, is not due to the additional actual costs the practice of physician recruitment;
(4) The new doctor has a medical practice in the clinic as geographical area and join the hospital medical staff;
(5) The practice of consultation with the doctor hired must be specified in writing and signed by the parties;
(6) The new physician can be required to submit patients to the hospital and has privileges at another hospital staff to create and refer to other business agencies;
(7) The remuneration of a hospital, do not take into account (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of referrals (or expected) by the physician or physician practice game receiving direct payments from the hospital identified (or any other doctor with the doctor’s office is connected;
(8) The practice of doctors receiving payments from the hospital can not compete not to impose additional restrictions on medical practice (as a commitment), but can not impose conditions on the qualitative and
(9) The system can not comply with the anti-kickback and should be with all laws and accounting rules.
FEDERAL harbors anti-kickback safe and LAW
Under the federal anti-kickback is a person knowingly and willingly promote or receive prohibited from paying the tender or payment of compensation in consideration for reference or make recommendations for goods and services under federal programs. However, there is a “regulatory safe harbor that protects physician recruitment payments. Note, however, that contrary to Stark, the Federal Republic of anti-kickback safe harbor applies to the establishment of payments Adjustment to a shortage of health sector professional installation inducing (“HPSA”). The safe harbor does not protect payments recruitment through the development in areas that are not designated as HPSAs. The parameter “safe harbor applies to payments by a corporation to a doctor who had been in his current practice specialty find for less than a year, or induce any other practitioner to relocate to organize its principal place of practice a HPSA for his area of specialty that is served by the company as the following conditions are met:
Remarkably, the anti-kickback statue intent, which has been interpreted broadly, an agreement, aims to encourage referrals belong. Regulation Safe Harbor define practices not subject to the anti-kickback, but because it is a game of “safe harbor, not per se unlawful agreement. Instead, the facts and circumstances surrounding the arrangement to be carefully considered. In this regard, although there is no shelter that applies to the adjustment of payments outside the HPSA context, it may reduce the risk if all other requirements of the Safe Harbor that are HPSA issues met.
Summary
Doctors involved in the recruitment process should be designed, taking into account the complex legal requirements. Violations of the Stark and anti-kickback law are severe. Each doctor examined a deal for recruitment should the opinion of experienced prosecutor to ensure that laws are respected and sought protection in the agreements, the physician should be terminated.
http://www. racattorneys. com
Legal Issues Impacting Physician Recruitment Relationships
Saturday, June 12th, 2010In general, two of the primary laws that are applicable to recruitment arrangements are: (1) the Federal “Stark” law; and (2) the Federal Anti-kickback law and the accompanying safe harbor for physician recruitment.
FEDERAL STARK –PHSYICIAN RECRUTIMENT EXCEPTION
The Federal Stark law prohibits a physician from making a referral to an entity for the furnishing of “designated health services” (“DHS”) and the entity from submitting a claim for the service if there is a financial relationship between the physician and the DHS entity, unless an exception exists. An exception exists for physician recruitment. Under Stark, a hospital is permitted to pay a physician to relocate to the hospital’s geographic area in order for the physician to be a member of the hospital’s medical staff.
Specifically, the recruitment arrangement must meet the following requirements
(1) The arrangement is set out in writing and signed by both parties;
(2) The arrangement cannot be conditioned on the physician’s referrals;
(3) The amount of remuneration under the agreement may not be determined in a manner that takes into account (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of any referrals by the physician; and
(4) The physician must be allowed to establish staff privileges at any other hospital and to refer business to other entities.
Relocation:
A hospital is permitted to pay a physician to relocate to the hospital’s geographic area. In order to meet the relocation requirement, the physician must:
(1) Relocate his/ her practice a minimum of twenty-five (25) miles; or
(2) At least seventy-five percent (75%) of the physician’s revenues must come from care provided to new patients.
Note, however, the Stark regulations afford special treatment to residents and new physicians (physicians who have been in practice less than one year). These physicians will be eligible for the physician recruitment exception regardless of whether they actually move their practices.
Geographic Area:
With regard to the geographic area, the regulations define the geographic area served by the hospital as the area composed of the lowest number of contiguous zip codes from which the hospital draws at least 75% of its inpatients. The geographic area requirement dictates both the area from which the hospital may not recruit established physicians, and also as an area within which the recruited physician must relocate his/her practice.
Payments Made to a Physician Who Joins a Group:
The Stark regulations add additional conditions when a recruitment payment is made (1) indirectly through another physician or group practice or (2) directly to a physician who is joining an existing physician or group practice. To meet these additional conditions, the following requirements must be met:
(1) The arrangement between the hospital and physician practice is in writing and signed by the parties: in a situation where a physician joins a host practice, the recruitment contract will be a three- party agreement signed by the hospital, recruited physician and host PC or PLLC;
(2) The remuneration is passed directly through to, or remains with, the recruited physician (except for actual costs incurred by the practice in recruiting the new physician);
(3) In the case of an income guarantee made by the hospital to a physician who joins a local physician practice, costs allocated by the physician practice to the recruited physician may not exceed the actual additional incremental costs to the practice attributable to the recruited physician;
(4) The new physician must establish a medical practice in the hospital’s geographic area and join the hospital’s medical staff;
(5) The practice’s arrangement with the recruited physician must be set out in writing and signed by the parties;
(6) The new physician may not be required to refer patients to the hospital and is allowed to establish staff privileges at any other hospital and to refer business to other entities;
(7) The remuneration from the hospital is not determined in any manner that takes into account (directly or indirectly) the volume or value of any referrals (actual or anticipated) by the recruited physician or by the physician practice receiving the direct payments from the hospital (or any physician affiliated with that physician practice;
(8) The physician practice receiving the hospital payments may not impose additional practice restrictions on the recruited physician (e.g., a covenant not to compete), but may impose conditions related solely to quality considerations; and
(9) The arrangement must not violate the anti-kickback statute and must comply with all relevant billing laws and regulations.
FEDERAL ANTI-KICKBACK LAW AND SAFE HARBOR
Under the Federal Anti-kickback law, a person is prohibited from knowingly and willfully soliciting or receiving, offering or paying any remuneration in return for referring or inducing referrals for goods and services paid for under federal government programs. However, there is a regulatory safe harbor that protects physician recruitment payments. Of note, however, is that unlike Stark, the Federal Anti-kickback safe harbor applies to recruitment payments to induce recruitment into a health care professional shortage area (“HPSA”). The safe harbor does not protect recruitment payments in connection with recruitment into areas that are not designated as HPSAs. The recruitment safe harbor applies to payments by an entity in order to induce a practitioner who has been practicing within his or her current specialty for less than one year to locate, or to induce any other practitioner to relocate, his or her primary place of practice into a HPSA for his or her specialty area that is served by the entity, as long as the following requirements are met:
Notably, the Anti-kickback statute is an intent based statue, which is broadly worded and has been interpreted to include any arrangement, one purpose of which is to induce referrals. The safe harbor regulations define practices that are not subject to the Anti-kickback statute but failure to comply with a safe harbor, does not make an arrangement per se illegal. Instead, the particular facts and circumstances surrounding the arrangement must be carefully scrutinized. In this regard, although there is not a safe harbor that applies to recruitment payments outside of the HPSA context, it may reduce risk if all of the other requirements of the safe harbor, which do not involve HPSA issues, are met.
Summary
Physicians involved in recruitment arrangements must be mindful of the complex legal requirements. Violations of the Stark and the Anti-kickback law are severe. Any physician contemplating entering into a recruitment arrangement should seek the advice of experienced counsel to ensure that the laws are complied with and in order to obtain protections in the agreements should the physician be terminated.
Fiscal year 1990 budget issues relating to payment of inner-city and rural hospitals under Part A of the Medicare program: Hearing before the Subcommittee … First Congress, first session, May 15, 1989
Friday, April 16th, 2010Product Description
This volume is produced from digital images created through the University of Michigan University Library’s large-scale digitization efforts. The Library seeks to preserve the intellectual content of items in a manner that facilitates and promotes a variety of uses. The digital reformatting process results in an electronic version of the original text that can be both accessed online and used to create new print copies. The Library also understands and values the usefulness of print and makes reprints available to the public whenever possible. This book and hundreds of thousands of others can be found in the HathiTrust, an archive of the digitized collections of many great research libraries. For access to the University of Michigan Library’s digital collections, please see http://www.lib.umich.edu and for information about the HathiTrust, please visit http://www.hathitrust.org
Hospital prospective payment: Issues and experiences
Thursday, March 18th, 2010Fiscal year 1988 budget reconciliation issues relating to the reimbursement of hospital capital expenditures under the Medicare program: Hearing before … Congress, first session, May 4, 1987
Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010Product Description
This volume is produced from digital images created through the University of Michigan University Library’s large-scale digitization efforts. The Library seeks to preserve the intellectual content of items in a manner that facilitates and promotes a variety of uses. The digital reformatting process results in an electronic version of the original text that can be both accessed online and used to create new print copies. The Library also understands and values the usefulness of print and makes reprints available to the public whenever possible. This book and hundreds of thousands of others can be found in the HathiTrust, an archive of the digitized collections of many great research libraries. For access to the University of Michigan Library’s digital collections, please see http://www.lib.umich.edu and for information about the HathiTrust, please visit http://www.hathitrust.org
Fiscal year 1990 budget issues relating to hospital payment under Part A of Medicare program: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Health of the Committee … First Congress, first session, March 1, 1989
Sunday, December 23rd, 2007Product Description
This volume is produced from digital images created through the University of Michigan University Library’s large-scale digitization efforts. The Library seeks to preserve the intellectual content of items in a manner that facilitates and promotes a variety of uses. The digital reformatting process results in an electronic version of the original text that can be both accessed online and used to create new print copies. The Library also understands and values the usefulness of print and makes reprints available to the public whenever possible. This book and hundreds of thousands of others can be found in the HathiTrust, an archive of the digitized collections of many great research libraries. For access to the University of Michigan Library’s digital collections, please see http://www.lib.umich.edu and for information about the HathiTrust, please visit http://www.hathitrust.org
Small businesses consider benefits of ChamberPlus insurance: coverage costs and availability remain critical issues for many.(focus insurance & employee … article from: Mississippi Business Journal
Saturday, August 4th, 2007Product Description
This digital document is an article from Mississippi Business Journal, published by Thomson Gale on February 2, 2004. The length of the article is 914 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Small businesses consider benefits of ChamberPlus insurance: coverage costs and availability remain critical issues for many.(focus insurance & employee benefits)
Author: Becky Gillette
Publication: Mississippi Business Journal (Magazine/Journal)
Date: February 2, 2004
Publisher: Thomson Gale
Volume: 26 Issue: 5 Page: 19(1)
Distributed by Thomson Gale
Access, Choices, and Household Income: A Comparison of Health Insurance Coverage for Standard and Nonstandard Workers.: An article from: Journal of Economic Issues
Thursday, July 26th, 2007Product Description
This digital document is an article from Journal of Economic Issues, published by Association for Evolutionary Economics on June 1, 2000. The length of the article is 3339 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Access, Choices, and Household Income: A Comparison of Health Insurance Coverage for Standard and Nonstandard Workers.(Statistical Data Included)
Author: Carolyn B. Rodriguez
Publication: Journal of Economic Issues (Refereed)
Date: June 1, 2000
Publisher: Association for Evolutionary Economics
Volume: 34 Issue: 2 Page: 499
Article Type: Statistical Data Included
Distributed by Thomson Gale





