Product DescriptionThis digital document is an article from National Catholic Reporter, by the National Catholic Reporter, published May 15, 2009. The length of the article is 376 words. The length of the page above on a typical page of 300 words. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser. Citation Details Title: Study: Universal health coverage could reduce imbalances. (Nation) (health insurance) Author: Paul KleymanPublication: National Catholic Reporter (Magazine / Journal) Date: 15 May 2009Publisher: National Catholic Reporter Volume: 45 Issue: 15 Page: 8 (1) Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning
Posts Tagged ‘could’
Study: Universal coverage could reduce disparities in health. : An article from: National Catholic Reporter
Friday, August 27th, 2010Hawaii could be very affordable health insurance mandates supporters?
Thursday, August 19th, 2010One of the most controversial aspects of the reform of health care is the participation of employers and individual health insurance mandate. Supporters of the mandate denying claims that he will increase the costs of introducing millions of uninsured Americans in the womb. affordable health insurance if the insurer is better able to cover the cost of the largest pool possible dissemination. Without a mandate, it is possible that young, healthy people do not buy insurance – these are just individuals in the most dependent of Sickest medical insurance. This will cover the cost of expensive. The Congress for subsidies to make health insurance more affordable than the carrot used to motivate research in this population. Nevertheless, the government is also a stick which is why the powers to fines imposed on people over a certain annual income to buy an insurance policy to refuse. Critics believe that these mandates are unreasonable invasions on the open market and young adults ill. Some even believe that a national mandate for health insurance was unconstitutional, and a group of Republican attorneys general of several states to expedite planning a legal challenge by the bill. The individual mandate in Massachusetts has had mixed results, there has been some improvement in accessibility has been, but some people decided to pay up to a thousand dollars a year in fines to buy coverage – that they think they are cheaper and do not think they will be health insurance in the near future. Despite these concerns, a warrant of some sort is necessary to bring the illness on board, their cooperation with the death of a public option is essential. For increased regulation to prevent coverage is denied by medical history, they want to delay the people who buy coverage until they are already sick and expensive medical care. Their business model is based on the majority of people pay years worth of premiums in the system, without much care. Hawaii has taken a different path. Since 1974, the mandate requires that all employers provide a certain size of their employees health insurance. The House of Representatives and the Senate have similar mandates, offers tax breaks and exemptions for small businesses. In fact, the efforts of the Clinton administration health care reform have been inspired by the system of Hawaii. Consequently, most people have health insurance. What’s worked in Hawaii? It has been a surprising success. Health insurance is one of the cheapest shopping on the islands, although the generally higher costs for everything else, are due to shipping. Premiums and copayments are some of the lowest in the United States. Proponents of the system have a mandate that results in a higher rate of insured, as the cause of their health insurance affordable. Emergency rooms are real emergencies, left, contrary to the destination of last resort, when care of uninsured Americans can not be denied. Instead, the non-emergency conditions treated in the early stages and at lower cost by GPS. The cost of a larger population has not been for the federal government either. When it comes to health insurance, Hawaii is the state the lowest cost of Medicare beneficiaries on an individual basis, even if their life is longer than the national average. This is partly due to improved comprehensive care for their people before their eligibility for Medicare. Affordable health insurance policies drive more emphasis on preventive care and promotion of well-being are among the patients. Therefore, giving Hawaiians age healthier, with fewer chronic illnesses. On the mainland, health insurance often have to catch up. More importantly, the mandate affordable health insurance that does not seem to have affected the quality of care. None other than the famous conservative commentator (and opponents of health reform) Rush Limbaugh has recently praised the care he received at a hospital in Hawaii after being admitted for chest pain. During his wealth and celebrity status may have an impact on the attention that has been, should not have mattered if they were old, outdated equipment and less doctors. In addition, Limbaugh did not notice when you long waiting lists, even if he himself avoided because of his fame, he would have noticed if others had been waiting in the emergency room for a long period. It is possible that once the dust settles, the system of Hawaii, the best way to reform national health care. (Photo: Scott NJ, second DC 12:00)
payments of insurance could care infusion is targeted for hospitals transferred. : An article from: Family Practice News
Monday, August 16th, 2010Product DescriptionThis digital document is an article from Family Practice News, News from the International Medical Group May 1, 2004. The length of the article is 661 words. The length of the page above on a 300-word page type. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon. com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser. Citation Details Title: Medicare payments could target infusion care hospitals has transferred. (Trends in practice) Author: Mary Ellen SchneiderPublication: Family Practice News (Magazine / Journal) Date: May 1 2004Publisher: Volume International Medical Group News: 34 Issue: 9 Page: 96 (1) Distributed by Thomson Gale
Hawaiian could be very affordable health insurance mandates supporters?
Sunday, August 15th, 2010One of the most controversial aspects of the reform of health care is the participation of employers and individual health insurance mandate. Supporters of the mandate denying claims that he will increase the costs of introducing millions of uninsured Americans in the womb. affordable health insurance if the insurer is better able to cover the cost of the largest pool possible dissemination. Without a mandate, it is possible that young, healthy people do not buy insurance – these are just individuals in the most dependent of Sickest medical insurance. This amount will cover the cost of expensive. The Congress for subsidies to make health insurance more affordable than the carrot used to motivate research in this population. However, the government is also a stick of where the authority to make fines against individuals on a certain annual income, but to refuse to purchase insurance. Critics believe that these mandates are unreasonable invasions on the open market and young adults ill. Some even believe that a national mandate for health insurance was unconstitutional, and a group of Republican attorneys general of several states to expedite planning a legal challenge by the bill. The individual mandate in Massachusetts has had mixed results, there has been some improvement in accessibility has been, but some people decided to pay up to a thousand dollars a year in fines to buy coverage – that they think they are cheaper and do not think they will be health insurance in the near future. Despite these concerns, a warrant of some sort is necessary to bring the illness on board, their cooperation with the death of a public option is essential. Since increase of regulations to prevent the cover is denied by medical history, they want to delay people who buy a blanket until they are already sick and expensive medical care. Their business model is based on the majority of people pay years worth of premiums in the system, without much care. Hawaii has taken a different path. Since 1974, the mandate requires that all employers provide a certain size of their employees health insurance. The House of Representatives and the Senate have similar mandates, offers tax breaks and exemptions for small businesses. In fact, efforts by the Clinton Administration health care reform have been inspired by the system of Hawaii. Consequently, most people have health insurance. How the system worked in Hawaii? It has been a surprising success. Health insurance is one of the cheapest shopping on the islands, although the generally higher costs for everything else, are due to shipping. Premiums and copayments are some of the lowest in the United States. Proponents of the system have a mandate that results in a higher rate of insured, as the cause of their health insurance affordable. Emergency rooms are real emergencies, left, contrary to the destination of last resort, when care of uninsured Americans can not be denied. Instead, the non-emergency conditions treated in the early stages and at lower cost by GPS. The cost of a larger population has not been for the federal government is. When it comes to health insurance, Hawaii is the state the lowest cost of Medicare beneficiaries on an individual basis, even if their life is longer than the national average. This is partly due to improved comprehensive care for their people before their eligibility for Medicare. Affordable health insurance policies drive more emphasis on preventive care and promotion of well-being are among the patients. Therefore, giving Hawaiians age healthier, with fewer chronic illnesses. On the mainland, health insurance often have to catch up. More importantly, the mandate affordable health insurance that does not seem to have affected the quality of care. None other than famous conservative commentator (and opponents of health reform) Rush Limbaugh has recently praised the care he received at a hospital in Hawaii after being admitted for chest pain. During his wealth and celebrity status may have an impact on the attention that has been, should not have mattered if they were old, outdated equipment and less doctors. In addition, Limbaugh did not warn you if the long waiting lists, even if he himself avoided because of its reputation, but he noticed that others were waiting in the emergency room for an extended period . It is possible once the dust settles, the system of Hawaii, the best way to reform national health care. (Photo: Scott NJ, second DC 12:00)
Medicare: Physician incentive payments to hospitals could lead to abuse: report of the Chairman of the Subcommittee on Health, Committee on the means, the House of Representatives
Saturday, August 14th, 2010Product DescriptionThis volume of digital images by the University of Michigan University Library digitization efforts created large-scale production. The library is the intellectual content of elements in a way that facilitates and encourages a variety of applications to obtain. The numerical results in reformatting an electronic version of the original text, both online and recovered and used to create new designs can be created. The library also includes the values and benefits of the printing and reprinting is available to the public whenever possible. This book and hundreds of thousands of others can HathiTrust, an archive of digitized collections of many major research libraries are located. To access the University of Michigan Digital Library Collections, see http://www. lib. UMich. edu for information on HathiTrust, please visit http://www. hathitrust. org
Hawaii could be very affordable health insurance mandates fans!
Tuesday, August 10th, 2010One of the most controversial aspects of the reform of health care is the participation of employers and individual health insurance mandate. Supporters of the mandate denying claims that he will increase the costs of introducing millions of uninsured Americans in the womb. affordable health insurance if the insurer is better able to cover the cost of the largest pool possible dissemination. Without a mandate, it is possible that young, healthy people do not buy insurance – these are just individuals in most Sickest depend on medical insurance. This amount will cover the cost of expensive. The Congress for subsidies to make health insurance more affordable than the carrot used to motivate research in this population. But the government is also a stick of where the authority to make fines against individuals on a certain annual income, that refuse insurance. Critics believe that these mandates are unreasonable invasions on the open market and young adults ill. Some even believe that a national mandate for health insurance was unconstitutional, and a group of Republican attorneys general of several states to expedite planning a legal challenge by the bill. The individual mandate in Massachusetts has had mixed results, there has been some improvement in accessibility has been, but some people decided to pay up to a thousand dollars a year in fines to buy coverage – that they think they are cheaper and do not think they will be health insurance in the near future. Despite these concerns, a warrant of some sort is necessary to bring the illness on board, their cooperation with the death of a public option is essential. Since increased regulation to prevent coverage is denied by medical history, they want to delay people who buy coverage until they are already sick and expensive medical care. Their business model is based on the majority of people pay years worth of premiums in the system, without much care. Hawaii has taken a different path. Since 1974, the mandate requires that all employers provide a certain size of their employees health insurance. The House of Representatives and the Senate have similar mandates, offers tax breaks and exemptions for small businesses. In fact, the efforts of the Clinton administration health care reform have been inspired by the system of Hawaii. Consequently, most people have health insurance. How the system worked in Hawaii? It has been a surprising success. Health insurance is one of the cheapest shopping on the islands, although the generally higher costs for everything else, are due to shipping. Premiums and copayments are some of the lowest in the United States. Proponents of the system have a mandate that results in a higher rate of insured, as the cause of their health insurance affordable. Emergency rooms are real emergencies, left, contrary to the destination of last resort, when care of uninsured Americans can not be denied. Instead, the non-emergency conditions treated in the early stages and at lower cost by GPS. The cost of a larger population has not been for the federal government either. When it comes to health insurance, Hawaii is the state the lowest cost of Medicare beneficiaries on an individual basis, even if their life is longer than the national average. This is partly due to improved comprehensive care for their people before their eligibility for Medicare. Affordable health insurance policies drive more emphasis on preventive care and promotion of well-being are among the patients. Therefore, giving Hawaiians age healthier, with fewer chronic illnesses. On the mainland, health insurance often have to catch up. More importantly, the mandate affordable health insurance that does not seem to have affected the quality of care. None other than the famous conservative commentator (and opponents of health reform) Rush Limbaugh has recently praised the care he received at a hospital in Hawaii after being admitted for chest pain. During his wealth and celebrity status may have an impact on the attention that has been, should not have mattered if they were old, outdated equipment and less doctors. In addition, Limbaugh did not notice when you long waiting lists, even if he himself avoided because of his fame, he would have noticed if others had been waiting in the emergency room for a long period. It is possible that once the dust settles, the system of Hawaii, the best way to reform national health care. (Photo: Scott NJ, second DC 12:00)
What could
Thursday, July 29th, 2010This Could Be Your Grandpa: Indirect Euthanasia Via Health Insurance?
Wednesday, June 9th, 2010 A sad story in Miami, Florida regarding health insurance was recently brought to my attention. It highlights the flaws inherent in both public and private health insurance plans, and is an example of why healthcare reform is so important. A friend of mine has an ailing grandfather, named Benito Jimenez. Benito’s daughter, Maria Conroy cares for him 24/7, and has taken charge of navigating the complexities of his insurance coverage. Her 85-year-old father has Medicare, but also has a Medicare Advantage administered by Humana. This would seem like an ideal compromise of the government and corporations, which would allow them to provide the best healthcare possible. Instead, it’s only brought Maria and her family one frustration after another. Benito suffers from various conditions, but his health recently took a turn for the worse. He has developed anemia, which decreases the amount of healthy red blood cells. Severe anemia prevents your body from pumping oxygen everywhere it’s needed, so it’s obviously an urgent concern, especially for senior citizens. His doctors aren’t sure where his internal bleeding is coming from, though Maria suspects that it’s related to a previous stomach ulcer that was caused due to Benito taking a large combination of medications daily. The recommended test is an endoscopy, generally considered a simple and safe procedure (as opposed to a colonoscopy, which is more invasive). Unfortunately, possibly due to Benito’s age, his gastroenterologist–part of his primary care doctor’s “team”–refuses to perform it himself, despite being able and certified to do so–Maria feels that he is most likely scared of a malpractice lawsuit. Maria begged him to allow her to sign a waiver removing his liability, but he refused to take the risk of doing it on an outpatient basis. That gastroenterologist further explained that he would be obligated to do any and all tests necessary to save Benito’s life if he was in a hospital setting. After the gastroenterologist told them to go to the hospital (where the procedure would be performed at a higher cost to them, as well as their health insurance), Maria and Benito were kicked back to their primary care physician. Despite Benito’s hemoglobin level being a very low 8.5, they were told that he wouldn’t be referred to a hospital until his hemoglobin level was 7. She is unclear as to whether the doctor or the insurance company establishes this arbitrary rule. If they had investigated his medical history, a hemoglobin level of 8 had previously sent Benito to the hospital in need of a blood transfusion. In the infinite wisdom of Medicare and Humana’s reimbursement rules, they would not offer preventative treatment until he was in critical condition and needed even more medical care. This runaround was costly for Maria, both financially and emotionally. Benito was prescribed an increasing number of medications to mask his symptoms, but they produced other side effects and exacerbated his main problem (while also resulting in higher co-pays). She felt that the doctors were condescending and were more focused on preventing health insurance fraud than providing care. While Medicare fraud is relatively common, the preventative measures may have backfired. Honest, ethical patients and their loved ones don’t receive the care they need, because they are unaware of the loopholes. For example, a previous cardiologist of Benito’s once referred him to Baptist Hospital in Miami, in order for another specialist to examine him; however, his insurance company wouldn’t pay for a visit to that particular hospital. The cardiologist suggested that he pretend to faint somewhere in close physical proximity to the hospital or in the hospital lobby, so they would be forced to admit him and later discover what he actually needed. This suggestion shocked and dismayed Maria. For too many doctors, the health insurance bureaucracy has changed their caring vocation into an impersonal business. Ideally, healthcare reform would change this, eventhough this story shows an negative example of government involvement in health insurance. The saddest part of Maria’s story is that Benito was present when a cardiologist, that his primary care doctor urged him to consult with, shockingly informed Maria, as if he wasn’t capable of understanding or wasn’t listening, that further investigation would be pointless due to his frail condition–or at least, not enough of a sure thing to avoid the risk of lawsuits. They indirectly, but essentially told her, in front of him, that he should go home, medicate the symptoms and wait to die. Again, their fear of malpractice judgments and desire to bill Humana and the federal government (thereby making up for decreased funding that cut reimbursement rates) for as many procedures as possible overtook their oath to “do no harm”. It seems as though they prefer to wait until someone is in critical condition to provide preventative care, which results in their needing even more medical care. Meanwhile, Benito’s condition was far from terminal. A previous gastroenterologist agreed to perform an outpatient procedure, but his insurance was only willing to cover the specialist recommended by his primary care doctor. As opposed to working together for the benefit of the patient, that doctor steered them to the uncooperative gastroenterologist described above. Since the outcome was unsuccessful, Maria eventually managed to get her father’s initial gastroenterologist covered under his health insurance plan; however, the delay was detrimental to his care. Benito’s anemia is now critical: this lessens the chances of success of an outpatient endoscopy and might mean that he’ll need a hospital stay, after all. In Maria’s own words, the health insurance industry has enacted its own “cash for clunkers” program. Only in this case, the so-called “clunkers” are older Americans being sent to the junkyard. There’s a lot of fault to go around: Medicare stretches its budget to the limit and has bureaucrats making coverage decisions, while for-profit insurers like Humana have CEOs and shareholders that also demand a reduction in costs. The patients themselves–our parents, grandparents, siblings, children, partners, and friends–are lost in the midst this battle, even though they should be the most important factor of all. Some opponents of the public option claim that it will lead to the forced euthanasia of seniors, while others believe those claims are overblown. Nevertheless, indirect euthanasia is already happening right now; this is a case in point. Healthcare reform is a complicated issue, and it’s deeper than greater availability of affordable health insurance. That won’t matter if, after paying premiums and/or taxes for decades, your insurance won’t give you the care you need most. I don’t claim to know what proposal will work best, but Maria says that the current system is broken and that we urgently need healthcare reform of some kind. “Everybody doesn’t have a family member to be an advocate,” she adds. “I worry about how many elderly people fall through the cracks without someone to find the loopholes to work the system for them.”
Shop Around, Savvy Capitalists: Texas Could Save Big On Healthcare
Monday, March 15th, 2010Texans could save up to eighty percent on certain medical bills if they play their cards right, according to several publications released over the past few years. A typical American family of four is expected to receive $14,500 worth of medical care this year, and an insured family will pay an average of over a third of that — $5,100 — on their own. That’s eight percent higher than last year. With out-of-pocket expenses rising at least eight percent every year since 2000, it’s no wonder over 46 million Americans are going without health insurance — including over one-quarter of Texans.
In fact, according to John Holahan, Allison Cook, and Lisa Dubay of the Urban Institute, co-authors of Characteristics of the Uninsured: Who Is Eligible for Public Coverage and Who Needs Help Affording Coverage? released by the Kaiser Family Foundation, fifty-six percent of the uninsured are ineligible for public programs, but still need help to make typical health insurance plans affordable. Seventy-six percent of parents lacking health coverage are in working families, and 900,000 uninsured children are ineligible for public assistance-based coverage due to family income. Finding a way to make health care even slightly more affordable could be the difference in whether or not someone receives care.
According to the Commonwealth Fund, a private, non-partisan foundation supporting independent research on health and social issues, in 2005, thirty percent of the millions in the U.S. who lacked health insurance were between the ages of nineteen and twenty-nine. Texas had the worst record overall, with twenty-five percent of its total population going unprotected. The state actually failed to insure even more of its young adults — twenty-seven percent. Improving this statistic, as well as establishing ways for patients to pay at least part of their expenses, could be especially pertinent for cities like Dallas, Houston, and Austin, where facilities are financially overwhelmed by the uninsured.
Children are more likely to be eligible for public assistance-based coverage than their parents — and therefore more likely to qualify for help with medical expenses. This is because most states set family income limits for minors higher than for their parents. For instance, the majority of states will cover children if their families make 200% of the federal poverty level (though current policies are under dispute) — sometimes more — but many will only insure parents if that income level is at, or below, federal poverty level standards. Only twenty-eight percent of uninsured parents are actually eligible for Medicaid or the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, whereas three-quarters of uninsured children would qualify for those programs under current policies.
A study commissioned by the Kaiser Family Foundation and authored by Jack Hadley of the Urban Institute states that “the uninsured receive less care and have worse outcomes following an accident or onset of a new chronic condition than those with insurance.” This is mostly due to cost. Albeit seemingly somewhat anti-intuitive, an extremely helpful trick is to treat health care costs like any other bill — shop around, bargain, and don’t be afraid to ask for breaks. The following tips are summarized from the Prevention article, “Health care For Less” by Julian Kesner.
(1) Shop Around For Labs
Compare different labs’ prices. Almost any lab can complete a basic blood analysis, for instance, but they won’t all charge the same. To streamline the process, obtain the Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code, a universally accepted number that corresponds to every billable medical service, and start asking around. The American Medical Association’s website, www.ama-assn.org, provides a free search engine for CPT codes.
Independent labs are cropping up in response to the high cost of health care, so investigate those, too; some of them charge up to seventy-five percent less than non-independent facilities. The site www.MyMedLab.com, with over 3,000 independent lab listings, is a good source with which to start your research. Just make sure the facilities are legal in your state — sorry residents of California, New Jersey, New York, and Rhode Island — and check with your doctor to make sure they’re of good caliber.
(2) Negotiate Your Hospital Bills
Here is something most hospitals won’t tell you: very few of their medical bills are paid in full. Insurance companies often negotiate charges and receive discounts — up to two-thirds of the bill — based on their contracts. If they can haggle, why can’t you? Especially if whatever you owe is a financial hardship — be it from deductibles, co-pays, or the full cost of services if uninsured — medical facilities will usually work with patients to make sure a solution is reached.
“The number of payers, including patients and insurance plans, who pay hospitals 100% of our charges is probably less than two percent,” said Ruth Levin, the vice-president for managed care at Continuum Health Partners in New York City.
Financial assistance programs associated with hospitals may also be useful.
(3) Make Sure You Aren’t Tested Twice Or Come In When It’s Not Necessary
According to a recent survey from the Commonwealth Fund, seventeen percent of adults report that their doctors have ordered duplicate tests. This is especially likely when a specialist is involved, as he or she may not have received the results of previous labs. Sign out x-rays and other labs from your primary care office, and bring them along. With the shortage of family doctors in this country, they’re often extremely busy and can’t always be counted on to forward results to another physician. Considering that a co-payment or deductible is almost always involved with lab tests, this could save a bundle.
Also, make sure in-office follow-up visits are necessary. It’s standard procedure to ask a patient to return after the results of a certain test or undergoing particular procedures, but a phone call may suffice. It never hurts to ask.
(4) Be Savvy With Prescription Drugs
Cheaper and generic drugs can cost up to seventy-five percent less. Ask your doctor if a cheaper alternative to your medication is available, or — even better — if there’s a generic version.
“Just be sure your doctor is intimately familiar with the benefits and risks of the alternate drugs for your condition,” warned Jerome P. Kassirer, M.D. and professor at Tufts University School of Medicine in Boston.
Shopping for drugs online is becoming increasingly popular, and with due cause. Large distributors often offer lower prices, as well as saving their clients the time and expense of visiting the local drug store. The website, www.Rxaminer.com, offers price comparisons and has a reputation for independence from special interest groups.
Try splitting pills, as well. Prescriptions are often based on the number of units per bottle, not necessarily on the actual dosage. If getting eighty milligram pills, instead of forty, for a refillable prescription and then splitting them in two is more economical, ask your doctor about it. This won’t be appropriate for all medications, of course, but if it is, you’ve just saved fifty percent.
(5) Barter
Hey, doctors need plumbing and massage services, too. If you have a service you feel may be useful to a physician, try bartering. You just never know.
(6) Negotiate With Your Doctor
Hopefully, doctors are in their profession because they’re compassionate. If you can’t make your co-payments and deductibles, ask him or her to work with you on the bill. Offering cash upfront for services may also be fruitful — either in exchange for the full cost of the bill, or for co-payments and deductibles you know you won’t be able to meet. Paying upfront often produces a situation that’s less of a hassle for physicians, anyway, as they will deal with fewer administrative and paperwork issues.
“They are the ones who can direct their billing department to give the patient a break,” said Levin.
(7) Hire An Advocate
Try hiring an advocate to help you deal with financial disputes when all else fails. Companies like Healthcare Advocates, Inc., based in Philadelphia, charges by the case — anywhere from fifty to four hundred dollars. Like it or not, even when you have insurance, you are responsible for whatever bills remain unpaid, and refusing to deal with outstanding balances may ruin your credit. Just make sure the flat-rate charge is worth what you think will be saved by hiring the intermediary.
(8) Get Individual Health Insurance
If you are uninsured, take the time to research an affordable policy that offers reasonable coverage. This may even make sense if you have an individual health insurance policy you are not pleased with due to high cost and/or poor benefits. An individual plan actually may be a better option for you than group health insurance at work, depending on how much your employer pays, and how well your dependents are covered.
Searching online is becoming an increasingly popular option, and often yields results. If you know you can afford something, but just haven’t wanted the hassle of looking, do it anyway! It may save you thousands in the end, as well as your health.
Medicare’s infusion payments could shift care to hospitals: moving target.: An article from: Family Practice News
Friday, February 26th, 2010Product Description
This digital document is an article from Family Practice News, published by International Medical News Group on May 1, 2004. The length of the article is 661 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available in your Amazon.com Digital Locker immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.
Citation Details
Title: Medicare’s infusion payments could shift care to hospitals: moving target.(Practice Trends)
Author: Mary Ellen Schneider
Publication: Family Practice News (Magazine/Journal)
Date: May 1, 2004
Publisher: International Medical News Group
Volume: 34 Issue: 9 Page: 96(1)
Distributed by Thomson Gale




