Posts Tagged ‘contract.’

Contract between hospitals and Blue Cross/Blue Shield close to expiring

Sunday, June 6th, 2010

Manatee County Blue Cross/Blue Shield clients may not have their insurance accepted at Manatee Memorial Hospital or Lakewood Ranch Medical Center.  The contract between the hospitals and the insurance company expires at the end of the month.It’s a scary situation for the 23,000 people in Manatee County who have that insurance.  Negotiations are still going on.  Blue Cross/Blue Shield and the hospitals have been talking since April with no success, and the January 1st deadline is fast approaching.Manatee Memorial Hospital and Lakewood Ranch Medical Center provide services you can’t find any where else in Manatee County.  “We’re the only hospital that offers acute care hospital behavioral services, that offers pediatric services, that offers OB service, that offers neo-natal intensive care service.  We’re the only hospital that has the emergency services that we have,” says Moody Chisholm, CEO of Manatee Health Systems.But unless an agreement is reached, people with Blue Cross/Blue Shield insurance will have to go to another hospital after the first of the year.  “Any PPO patients we will take care of.  Any HMO patients we will assess.  If it’s an emergency situation, we’ll take care of it here.  If it’s not, we’ll have to transfer them to an appropriate facility,” says Chisholm.Chisholm says the sticking point is the hospital is asking Blue Cross/Blue Shield for a slight increase in fees.  “We’re not a greedy hospital.  We are making an average rate increase request.  We need that to be able to maintain the services in this community that we have a reputation for providing.”But Blue Cross/Blue Shield vice president Dr. Barry Schwartz issued this statement: “We must balance the value provided by the hospital against the absolute need to provide affordable health coverage to our members.”Chisholm says the increase they’re asking for is less than 10%.But Blue Cross says: “The demands of Manatee hospitals and health systems are inconsistent with network arrangements for comparable hospitals in the state.”Chisholm says costs at Manatee Memorial have skyrocketed with the bad economy.  They’re seeing a big increase in the number of indigent, Medicaid and charity cases, and operating costs for medicine and equipment are also going up.  He hopes the partnership with Blue Cross/Blue Shield can continue.Blue Cross/Blue Shield still has a contract for patients at Blake Medical center in West Bradenton, and Doctor’s hospital in Sarasota.

Hughston Clinic, Jack Hughston Memorial Hospital renew contract with United Healthcare

Saturday, March 20th, 2010

After months of contract negotiations, Hughston Clinic and Jack Hughston Memorial Hospital have renewed their contract with United Healthcare.The parties agreed on a three-year contract, which will go into effect Sunday. UHC members, which include employees of the Muscogee County School District and the State of Georgia, will then have in-network access for services offered through the local clinic and hospital.The possibility of a consensus between the two parties was uncertain just four months ago — leaving about 800 patients in limbo. In July, Hughston management sent letters to those patients who could be affected to inform them discussions had already failed and the contract would be terminated. By that time, the parties had been negotiating intermittently for about six months.UHC, however, told the Ledger-Enquirer the contract was not ending and they were still involved in negotiations.Reimbursement rates were at issue. Hughston officials said UHC’s rates had been unreasonably reduced in the past few years; UHC said Hughston was asking for impracticable triple-digit increases.Roger Rollman, UHC Southeast director of communications, said the two parties were able to meet in the middle.“Statements in the past are statements in the past,” Rollman said. “Where we are at now is, we have a mutually acceptable contract…We’re delighted to have the clinic and hospital in-network and look forward to having our members use their services.”Neither UHC or Hughston officials would disclose terms of the new deal.Mark Baker, chief executive officer of the two medical facilities’ umbrella company Hughston Healthcare, also expressed his satisfaction with the contract.“It’s one of the best arrangements that, I think, we have made with a payer in quite a long time, and it took a lot of effort on their part and our part,” Baker said. “I feel we gained a good understanding of one another and what we were (both) trying to achieve.”Columbus-based Hughston Clinic is a multi-specialty orthopedic practice with nine offices in Georgia and Alabama. Phenix City’s Jack Hughston Memorial is a 70-bed hospital owned by a group of Hughston Clinic physicians.UHC is an insurance company that’s part of Minneapolis, Minn.-based UnitedHealth Group. It serves more than 25 million customers and contracts directly with about 590,000 physicians and health-care professionals and more than 4,900 hospitals across the country.

Blue Cross contract critical to hospital

Sunday, March 14th, 2010

An ongoing contract standoff between Allegiance Health and Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan is worth public attention for two reasons: 1. It will affect health premiums for local Blue Cross customers, and 2. It may affect the independence of this Jackson-run hospital.The price of insurance matters more today. The ability of Allegiance to survive on its own could matter more in the long run.Allegiance officials are going unusually public in their negotiations with Blue Cross, by far the largest insurer of their patients. The hospital contends that Blue Cross has not paid a fair share for medical procedures for years — $10 millions annually, it says — and that the insurer is offering too small of an increase in payments.This month, the hospital asked local businesses to urge Blue Cross to compromise, to give Allegiance a better deal. In response, Blue Cross officials say they are being fair, that what they pay the Jackson hospital is comparable to others in the region.Which side is right? We can’t say. No one can, unless they have access to financial documents for both organizations.What is clear is that the stakes in this showdown are high. The worst case for patients is that Allegiance would stop accepting Blue Cross. More likely is that this will add to the decade-long climb in the cost of local health care. Any agreements to pay Allegiance more ultimately will translate into higher health-insurance premiums.It is difficult to argue for any scenario in which employers pay more, but increasing Blue Cross payments to Allegiance presumably offers some real value. It could ensure the financial health of the hospital, which already operates on a slim profit margin.Allegiance is more than a local institution. It is Jackson County’s largest employer, and it has shown a willingness to invest in this community. We do not imagine the same level of commitment from an outside organization.We worry that Blue Cross is playing tougher with Allegiance because it is comparatively small. It holds much more leverage with this hospital than with, say, the University of Michigan Hospital. At the same time, Blue Cross must also protect its bottom line to compete in the private insurance market.The best anyone can hope for in this stalemate is a solution that keeps Blue Cross and Allegiance working together in mutual self-interest. A new contract must provide the insurer with a reasonable reimbursement rate, and the hospital with the fair payment structure that it needs to survive IssueAllegiance Health and Blue Cross Blue Shield engage in difficult contract talks.Our SayA resolution is important to the community, considering the cost of medical care and preserving a locally owned hospital.

Blue Cross, hospitals at odds over contract

Thursday, February 25th, 2010

A dispute over insurance payments has stalled contract negotiations between the state’s largest health insurer, Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Louisiana, and the state’s largest health system, Franciscan Missionaries of Our Lady Health System.On Wednesday, Blue Cross, which covers more than 1 million people, announced that the Franciscans, the parent company of Our Lady of the Lake Regional Medical Center and five other hospitals statewide, had decided not to renew its contract and would drop from the Blue Cross network effective Feb. 1.The Franciscan system also includes The Tau Center of Baton Rouge; St. Elizabeth Hospital in Gonzales; Our Lady of Lourdes Regional Medical Center and Heart Hospital of Lafayette, both in Lafayette; St. Francis Hospital’s two campuses in Monroe; and Assumption Community Hospital in Napoleonville.A split would also affect the customers of Blue Cross subsidiaries HMO Louisiana Inc. and Benefit Management Services, according to Blue Cross.Both sides left the door open for continued contract negotiations, which if unresolved could affect tens of thousands of Baton Rouge-area residents and even more statewide. Patients who go to out-of-network facilities pay higher costs.Two years ago, the groups struck a last-minute deal for a two-year contract after weeks of public wrangling over rates.In the latest negotiations, Blue Cross Chief Executive Officer Mike Reitz said the insurer has spent months working with the Franciscan Missionaries to better understand its cost structure and the health system’s needs.“Unfortunately there was no justification for us to pay them the requested amount,” Reitz said.The Franciscans had asked for a single-digit increase in reimbursements, Reitz said. Blue Cross countered with a smaller increase or a contract extension, which still meant the Franciscans would receive Blue Cross’s highest payment rate in the state.The Blue Cross announcement caught the Franciscan health system by surprise, Chief Executive Officer John Finan said. But it was probably part of the insurance company’s negotiating strategy.Finan said he and Reitz met just hours before the announcement. The Franciscan Missionaries expected the next step in negotiations would be to bring in a mediator to resolve the dispute, he said.“This whole thing kind of defies logic,” Finan said. “Blue Cross is asking us to accept a zero or minimal increase in payments while they have already increased premiums.”The health system would be happy to consider little or no increase if the resulting savings went to patients and their employers rather than Blue Cross, Finan said. Blue Cross had indicated it will increase premiums by 9 percent to 10 percent in 2010.Finan said Blue Cross members represent a $200 million book of business with the Franciscans. Nine percent to 10 percent, or $18 million to $20 million, would be a considerable savings to consumers and employers.Reitz said it’s possible that keeping the Franciscan system’s reimbursements the same would mean Blue Cross customers’ premiums would increase by less in the future.Still, the request for an increase runs counter to what customers, Congress and the Obama administration have demanded: that the private market get costs under control, Reitz said. In order to do that, health insurers have to do something about high-cost providers.“They are the highest-paid system in the state, and the requested increase would have put them even higher,” Reitz said. “We offered them something that they were unwilling to participate in so they canceled their participation.”Finan said he doesn’t know if the Franciscan system is paid more than other health systems, and he’s not sure the issue is relevant.The Franciscans said Blue Cross justified its zero-percent increase offer, in part, by describing the system’s mission, which includes care for children, trauma services, people with mental health challenges, people with AIDS, screenings for early detection of cancer or heart disease, as a luxury.“We think we provide high quality service, high quality care, and beneficial services to the community that are under-reimbursed or unreimbursed that others do not,” Finan said.Describing the mission-oriented programs as a luxury is offensive, Finan said.Reitz said Blue Cross is not trying to tell the Franciscans how to run their business.“I am suggesting that the marketplace, our customers, are only willing to pay so much,” Reitz said.If the Franciscans are providing a lot of services not related to patient care, Blue Cross is suggesting that in this economic climate, the Franciscans should look for ways to increase efficiency or put more money into patient care rather than other things, Reitz said. Since the Franciscan system is already the highest-paid, there should be money available for mission-related services if the system is run efficiently.From July to April, the Lake had 52,510 encounters with Blue Cross members, and St. Elizabeth Hospital in Gonzales had 15,198, Lake spokeswoman Kelly Zimmerman said. The Franciscan system had 113,711 encounters in total.Zimmerman said the numbers did not represent total patients seen because there were repeat visits by some patients.

FL: Co. obtains favorable reimbursement rate: hospital sued for failing to pay Co. per contract.: An article from: Hospital Law’s Regan Report

Sunday, February 14th, 2010

Product Description
This digital document is an article from Hospital Law’s Regan Report, published by Medical Law Publishing on November 1, 2009. The length of the article is 596 words. The page length shown above is based on a typical 300-word page. The article is delivered in HTML format and is available immediately after purchase. You can view it with any web browser.

Citation Details
Title: FL: Co. obtains favorable reimbursement rate: hospital sued for failing to pay Co. per contract.(Hospital Law Decisions of Note)
Author: A. David Tammelleo
Publication: Hospital Law’s Regan Report (Newsletter)
Date: November 1, 2009
Publisher: Medical Law Publishing
Volume: 50 Issue: 6 Page: 3(1)

Distributed by Gale, a part of Cengage Learning

FL: Co. obtains favorable reimbursement rate: hospital sued for failing to pay Co. per contract.: An article from: Hospital Law’s Regan Report