Archive for the ‘Hospital Payment’ Category

Improving the health insurance policy for payment of exceptional cases, hospital

Wednesday, July 14th, 2010

Improving the health insurance policy for payment of exceptional cases, hospital

Legal aspects of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement: Payment of hospital and medical

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

Legal aspects of Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement: Payment of hospital and medical

Prospective Payments and Hospital Discharge Planning with elderly

Monday, July 12th, 2010

Prospective Payments and Hospital Discharge Planning with elderly

Regulation of prospective payment: An analysis of the rate of hospital in New Jersey Adjustment Commission

Saturday, July 10th, 2010

Regulation of prospective payment: An analysis of the rate of hospital in New Jersey Adjustment Commission

Medicare prospective payment and the design of U.S. health care

Friday, July 9th, 2010

Product DescriptionThis is the definitive work on the future of the payment system of Medicare (PPS), which originated in 1972 amendments to Social Security was, was first applied to hospitals in 1983 and has been the Balanced Budget Act of 1997. Here explain Rick Mayes and Robert A. Berenson, MD, as a system of health insurance innovative payment resulted in transfers to providers (hospitals and physicians) to taxpayers (government insurers and employers) and how the provider responds to interventions professional and financial autonomy. They conclude with a discussion of problems with the Medicare Modernization Act of 2003 and has recipes, how policymakers can use Medicare payments for improvements in American health care system. Mayes and Berenson based on interviews with more than seventy-five major makers – including former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, U. S. House of Representatives Pete Stark and Henry Waxman, the former White House Chief of Staff Leon Panetta and former director of the Health Care Financing Administration Gail Wilensky, Bruce Vladeck, Nancy-Ann talking nonsense, and Tom Scully to investigate – how the payment system and has worked its significant impact on the American landscape of medicine over the last twenty years. They argue that although managed care has been a key driver of change in the 1990s, the private sector has not initiate the innovative health care in the United States, but the shift to insurance- disease and two MAP stimulus for economic restructuring of U.S. health care system.

Medicare prospective payment and the design of U.S. health care

Medicare Hospital new payment system: Is it working?

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Medicare Hospital new payment system: Is it working?

CMS spells out split/shared visit rule now that consults are no longer payable

Sunday, July 4th, 2010

In addition, CMS reps cite present Medicare law and says that practices should report just one inpatient care code per patient, per day. Even though CMS has done away payment for consult codes, it will continue to honor split/shared visits — as long as they are billed using E/M codes and follow the payment rules already in place. That’s the word from CMS where staffers wanted to do away with the confusion stemming from the January MLN Matters article SE1010, which offered various questions and answers regarding how to bill Medicare following the elimination of consult code payment. Here, CMS noted that “the split/shared rules applying to Evaluation/Management services remain in effect, including those cases where services would previously have been reported by CPT consultation codes.” CMS’s Rebecca Cole noted during an April 13 CMS Open Door Forum, “We understand that this has led to some confusion, as there were — and are — different split/shared rules for consultation services compared to E/M services.” “We would like to clarify that Q&A,” said Cole. “As we are no longer recognizing the consultation CPT codes for purposes of payment under Part B, the split/shared rules regarding consultation services are no longer applicable. Since Evaluation/Management visit codes are being billed for services that were previously reported by the CPT consultation codes, the split/shared rules pertaining to E/M services apply when billing E/M CPT codes,” stressed Cole. Do not forget: You can still report shared/split visits as per the regulations using E/M codes; however you cannot collect from Medicare for any consultation codes. CMS is thinking about issuing a clarification in writing to do away with any confusion pertaining to the shared/split billing rule, noted Cole. CMS Asks Practices to Rein in Initial Inpatient BillingOne caller wanted clarification on billing for hospital care now that consult codes are not payable. She asked whether a physician can go for two initial hospital care codes for the same patient on the same date — for example, if the physician saw the patient before surgery for one reason, and then saw the patient post surgery for another reason. “I think you should consult the CPT rules in addition to the manual, however I think our reaction to that is no,” CMS’s William Rogers, MD, said during the call. Rogers said that the initial hospital care codes refer to that physician’s first visit with the patient. He advised that later evaluations should be billed by means of subsequent hospital care codes. On the other hand, CMS reps pointed to the fact that they’ll look into the issue further to find out whether doctors should be able to report a second initial hospital care code if specifically requested to review a different condition. “We can think about this further and decide what our next steps will be,” Rogers said. Until then, CMS staffers urged practices to continue billing according to published rules. In black and white: Both initial inpatient hospital care codes and following hospital care codes are ‘per diem’ services and may be reported only once a day by the same doctor or doctors of the same specialty from the same group practice,” CMS Transmittal 1545 notes. Use Present Bone Density CodesOne caller was happy that, owing to the new health care reform legislation, CMS will be boosting payment for bone density tests, but said that the legislation listed old bone density test codes 76075 and 76077. He enquired whether MACs will be requesting those codes going forward, or whether practices should continue going for new codes 77080-77082. Advice: You should use the present codes 77080-77082 and not the old ones, CMS’s Amy Bassano said.

The Role of State Governments in Preventing Medical Errors

Saturday, July 3rd, 2010

On August 7, 2008, the Chicago Tribune posted a blog entitled “Illinois ponders how to treat medical errors” (chicagotribune.com). It was a scathing commentary on the lackluster performance of the Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services in protecting the state’s residents against medical mistakes, wanton neglect, incompetence, abuse and callous disregard of patients’ safety and well-being that runs rampant in hospitals and nursing homes across the State of Illinois and America. The reporter, Judith Graham quoted the Health Department spokesperson, who said, “We’re still in the very preliminary stages and it’ll probably be a while until we make a decision.” This shameful public display of indecisiveness and indifference from the state’s bureaucrats unfortunately reflects the attitude of the leadership in the governor’s mansion toward public safety.   

While I applauded Ms. Graham for bringing this travesty to light, I must respectfully admonish her for grossly understating the problem. Since the Federal Government, through the Institute of Medicine (IOM), made public the fact that hospitals were needlessly killing more than 100,000 people per year in 1999, actions taken that proved ineffective were as follows:

1.Hospital executives hired consultants to study the root causes of medical errors and make recommendations for prevention;2.State legislators passed laws requiring full disclosure of medical errors;3.State legislators passed laws requiring that health care workers take a one-time 2-hour course in the prevention of medical errors for licensure or registration renewal;Moreover, to make matters worse, some thirty states, including Florida passed laws creating roadblocks to finding legal representation to prosecute medical malpractice by cutting the contingency fees that lawyers may charge by at least two thirds. These new statutes completely undermined the whole concept of health care provider accountability. Then, of course it was no big surprise to find out that a private organization called Healthgrades, Inc had, in June of 2004, published estimates of more than two hundred thousand unnecessary hospital deaths per year and brought out the fact that hospitals across the board inadvertently kill 1 out of every 500 people admitted. Moreover, these statistics did not count the 192,000 reported annual deaths due to hospital-acquired infections.

Now, we have federal and state governments taking unilateral actions to deny payment for services arising out of “never events”, which are acts of gross negligence by omission or commission. While the jury is still out on these new fiscal tightening policies, we have yet to find even one lawmaker who will give a single thought to enforcing health codes, truth in advertising laws, statutory standards of care and fiscal responsibility regulations. Lawmakers and health authorities have yet to realize that in cases of flagrant violation of patient safety standards, they need to put those corporate criminals in jail where they can no longer perpetrate their wanton and callous disregard for human life.

On the other hand, notwithstanding that the great State of Illinois is now just beginning to look at the problem of medical negligence being the fifth leading cause of death in the United States, the rest of the “more aggressive states” are simply denying payment for treatment of untoward complications, without any system for adjudicating accountability. This will cause a serious delay in the payment of hospital bills and further undermined the financial integrity of an entire industry that is already strapped for cash. Hospitals will inevitably challenge most of the payment denials based on claiming that the complication in question was the result of the disease process and not attributable to the ever-expanding list of “never events”. This situation will also cause an additional financial burden with attorneys’ fees and the processing of tens of thousands of new denial of claim challenges. For the solution, it all boils down to holding individual members of the institutional controlling bodies accountable for deliberate decisions that place people’s lives in jeopardy, either civilly, criminally or both as the case may be. There also needs to be licensure for key positions in hospital management to ensure that those in charge are sufficiently knowledgeable as to how operate within acceptable standards of care.

Medi Care Rule Change by Peter Menkin

Thursday, July 1st, 2010

Medi Care payment rules changed in October, 2008. They will no longer pay the extra costs of treating patients who develop eight serious, preventable conditions after hospitalization. The list includes falls from bed, cathers-associated urinary tract infections and pressure ulcers. News reports indicate large insurance companies are considering similar policies. “Never Events”, hospital attributable medical errors, make up part of the list of the rule changes.

The Center for Medi Care and Medicaid (CMS) notes, “On February 8, 2006 the President signed the Deficit Reduction Act (DRA) of 2005 that required there be an adjustment in Medicare DRG (Diagnosis Related Group) payment for certain hospital-acquired conditions.”

Asking key questions of Health and Human Services regarding the rule changes:

(1) Who pays, and how/why if Medi Care no longer will pay?

The hospital absorbs the cost of treating the hospital-acquired condition, and may not bill the beneficiary for the difference between the two Medicare Severity Diagnosis Related Groups (MS-DRGs).

(2) Is there a limit on their payment, should the infection prove long and difficult in severity and length? Is there the likelihood of long severity of non-covered infection?

In unusual cases in which the costs of treatment greatly exceed the payment rate for the case based on the assigned MS-DRG, Medi Care may pay the hospital an outlier payment. In these cases, after the hospital’s costs of treatment exceed the MS-DRG payment rate by an outlier threshold, Medicare will begin to pay 80 percent of any additional costs. .. [T]he final rule included a tentative outlier threshold for fiscal year 2009 of  $20,185.   CMS plans to announce the final outlier threshold, after taking into account the MIPPA changes, soon.

(3) Why this change in the rule (budget issue?)?

These changes were mandated by the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005.

(4) Why have they picked these diseases?

These are not all diseases.  They are properly called “hospital-acquired conditions,” because they also include things like falls. .. [T]he public was given 60-days to comment, and were selected based on a review of the submitted comments.  According to criteria established in the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005, each condition had to be:

(5) What do they expect to be the result of the new policy? An opinion is desired

.

CMS Acting Administrator Kerry Weems says:

“While it may be some time before we can begin to assess the real impact of these steps on patient care, we are hearing from hospitals around the country about efforts they have undertaken in the past year to improve staff training and other measures to reduce the incidence of these preventable conditions.”

Many experts believe that these important changes will drive payment methods and criteria in the near future, and that the adjustments will motivate hospitals to reduce “Never Events.”

–Peter Menkin, San Francisco

 

 

Unlimited Job Posting for $99.00 Per Month

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

Hotel General Managers and Human Resource Professionals, let us be your personal recruiting assistant. We are not just another job board. We help Employers connect with qualified Job seekers.

We offer:

Unlimited Job postings for $99.00 per month*

Set qualifying questions to filter unqualified candidates

Post positions in just seconds – Create your own job templates

Allow us to post your positions for you

If you are a Hilton Family Hotel have your jobs posted on our site and on www.JobsAtHilton.com. Not a Hilton Brand this can be customized for your hotel/Brand.

Free full personal profile page for each employer

We offer recruiting services – Any orders placed in September will receive 50% off of our standard recruiting fees.

Price Per Posting

1-Job Posting : $199.00

5-Job Postings : $845.00

10-Job Postings : $1390.00

Current Special : Unlimited Job Postings $99.00 per month*

Unlimited Job Postings

There is no limit to the number of management and hourly postings. One year term required, and price is per hotel. Full pre-payment is required. We offer special pricing for owners of multiple properties and management companies with several properties. Please call our sales team at 888-767-9765 Ext. 701 for Special Pricing.

Bonus Features :

Receive Employment (labor law) Newsletter Monthly

Ability to advertise your property or product with us

Search hospitality Vendors

Contact Hospitality Vendors

Pay once for the entire year

Advanced resume search*

Post on-line or fax positions for

posting assistance*

Contact us at:

HospitalityResourceNetwork.com

E-mail: sales@HospitalityResourceNetwork.com

Phone: (888) 767-9765 Ext 701

Fax: 714-774-5304

Location: 2223 W. Ball Rd. Anaheim, CA 92804